From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:30:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]:59224 "EHLO elvis.franken.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27011908AbaKJVaYqyJLy (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:30:24 +0100 Received: from uucp (helo=solo.franken.de) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1XnwXY-0007w7-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:30:24 +0100 Received: by solo.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 21C761D33B; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:30:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:30:10 +0100 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Joshua Kinard , David Daney , Linux MIPS List Subject: Re: IP27: CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE triggers bus errors Message-ID: <20141110213009.GA29367@alpha.franken.de> References: <5457CF0A.7020303@gmail.com> <5458272A.7050309@gentoo.org> <54582A91.8040401@gmail.com> <20141105160945.GB13785@linux-mips.org> <545C9D4D.4090501@gentoo.org> <545D0FC4.7020205@gmail.com> <545EB09C.40006@gentoo.org> <5460636A.5090401@gentoo.org> <20141110105106.GA4302@linux-mips.org> <20141110112039.GA7294@alpha.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141110112039.GA7294@alpha.franken.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 43970 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: tsbogend@alpha.franken.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:20:39PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:51:06AM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > Thomas, > > > > can you test CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE on an IP28? > > > > All in all the R10000's TLB is unproblematic; my gut feeling is that > > rather something else specific to IP27 is spoiling the broth. > > I'll give it a spin later today. looks like IP28 has more problems than HUGEPAGES... even without huge pages enabled it locks up during upgrading debian packages:-( My gut feeling is that there is another spot hitting the ll/sc errata stuff for this old R10k CPU. So no new data out of that. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]