From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: "acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
"a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"eranian@google.com" <eranian@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"paulus@samba.org" <paulus@samba.org>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Construct LBR call chain
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 19:31:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141112183145.GA30122@krava.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F07701661906@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:37:13PM +0000, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> > > +
> > > + printf("... chain: nr:%" PRIu64 "\n", total_nr);
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < callchain_nr + 1; i++)
> > > printf("..... %2d: %016" PRIx64 "\n",
> > > i, sample->callchain->ips[i]);
> >
> > so if there's lbr callstack info we dont display user stack part from standard
> > callchain? I think the dump code should dump out all the info..
> >
>
> Right, we don't display user stack part from fp if there is lbr callstack info.
> The lbr callstack info can only be captured when the user set --call-graph
> lbr. If --call-graph is set to fp and dwarf, there will be no lbr callstack info.
>
> If the user set lbr, I think he really want the lbr info. So I think if we display
> both lbr and fp, the fp chain might be meaningless and it will confuse them.
> If the user want to do compare, they can do perf record twice with
> different --call-graph.
hum, IMO if the user wants the dump (report -D), she wants to see
everything she got from kernel
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-12 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-06 14:58 [PATCH 0/2] perf tool: Haswell LBR call stack support (user) kan.liang
2014-11-06 14:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: enable LBR call stack support kan.liang
2014-11-12 7:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-11-12 7:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-11-12 14:44 ` Liang, Kan
2014-11-06 14:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Construct LBR call chain kan.liang
2014-11-12 8:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-11-12 8:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-11-12 8:59 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-11-12 14:37 ` Liang, Kan
2014-11-12 15:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-12 18:31 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2014-11-12 12:33 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-11-10 10:54 ` [PATCH 0/2] perf tool: Haswell LBR call stack support (user) Peter Zijlstra
2014-11-10 14:08 ` Liang, Kan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141112183145.GA30122@krava.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.