From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: Appointing a new committer Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:20:00 -0500 Message-ID: <20141113192000.GD11727@laptop.dumpdata.com> References: <21604.65233.591428.51813@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XozwD-0006jk-2e for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:20:13 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Lars Kurth Cc: Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:05:45PM +0000, Lars Kurth wrote: > Ian, > > I totally agree. I don't think that limited maintainership in xen.git is > an issue. > > If I look at the process, it states that > a) A committer needs to nominate the candidate - tick > b) A private election amongst committers of the project must be held using > a voting form created by me, and then there will be a formal vote. > > If Konrad agrees, that he would be willing to be a committer, I will set > up a form and formal vote. I would do this tomorrow. Sure! Muhahhhahahahah.. Ahem, ignore that please :-) > > Regards > Lars > > > On 13/11/2014 18:56, "Ian Jackson" wrote: > > >I would like to propose that we make Konrad Wilk a Xen committer. > >Konrad is of course already a committer to Linux's Xen support. IMO > >he should formally have the authority of a committer in our project, > >even though his maintainership in xen.git itself is limited. > > > >Thanks, > >Ian. >