All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: roy.franz@linaro.org, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] EFI: allow retry of ExitBootServices() call
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:32:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141114153208.GD5364@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5466059A0200007800047A4B@mail.emea.novell.com>

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 12:37:30PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The specification is kind of vague under what conditions
> ExitBootServices() may legitimately fail, requiring the OS loader to
> retry:
> 
> "If MapKey value is incorrect, ExitBootServices() returns
>  EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER and GetMemoryMap() with ExitBootServices() must
>  be called again. Firmware implementation may choose to do a partial
>  shutdown of the boot services during the first call to
>  ExitBootServices(). EFI OS loader should not make calls to any boot
>  service function other then GetMemoryMap() after the first call to
>  ExitBootServices()."
> 
> While our code guarantees the map key to be valid, there are systems
> where a firmware internal notification sent while processing
> ExitBootServices() reportedly results in changes to the memory map.

s/reportedly/in fact/
> In that case, make a best effort second try: Avoid any boot service
> calls other than the two named above, with the possible exception of
> error paths. Those aren't a problem, since if we end up needing to
> retry, we're hosed when something goes wrong as much as if we didn't
> make the retry attempt.
> 
> For x86, a minimal adjustment to efi_arch_process_memory_map() is
> needed for it to cope with potentially being called a second time.

Wow. Talk about timing. We saw this and were going to see
doing something similar.


> 
> For arm64, while efi_process_memory_map_bootinfo() is easy to verify
> that it can safely be called more than once without violating spec
> constraints, it's not so obvious for fdt_add_uefi_nodes(), hence a
> step by step approach:
> - deletion of memory nodes and memory reserve map entries: the 2nd pass
>   shouldn't find any as the 1st one deleted them all,
> - a "chosen" node should be found as it got added in the 1st pass,
> - the various "linux,uefi-*" nodes all got added during the 1st pass
>   and hence only their contents may get updated.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> 
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static void __init efi_arch_process_memo
>  
>      /* Populate E820 table and check trampoline area availability. */
>      e = e820map - 1;
> -    for ( i = 0; i < map_size; i += desc_size )
> +    for ( e820nr = i = 0; i < map_size; i += desc_size )
>      {
>          EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR *desc = map + i;
>          u64 len = desc->NumberOfPages << EFI_PAGE_SHIFT;
> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
> @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ efi_start(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle, EFI_SY
>      EFI_GRAPHICS_OUTPUT_PROTOCOL *gop = NULL;
>      EFI_GRAPHICS_OUTPUT_MODE_INFORMATION *mode_info;
>      union string section = { NULL }, name;
> -    bool_t base_video = 0;
> +    bool_t base_video = 0, retry;
>      char *option_str;
>      bool_t use_cfg_file;
>  
> @@ -1051,17 +1051,23 @@ efi_start(EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle, EFI_SY
>      if ( !efi_memmap )
>          blexit(L"Unable to allocate memory for EFI memory map");
>  
> -    status = efi_bs->GetMemoryMap(&efi_memmap_size, efi_memmap, &map_key,
> -                                  &efi_mdesc_size, &mdesc_ver);
> -    if ( EFI_ERROR(status) )
> -        PrintErrMesg(L"Cannot obtain memory map", status);
> +    for ( retry = 0; ; retry = 1 )
> +    {
> +        status = efi_bs->GetMemoryMap(&efi_memmap_size, efi_memmap, &map_key,
> +                                      &efi_mdesc_size, &mdesc_ver);
> +        if ( EFI_ERROR(status) )
> +            PrintErrMesg(L"Cannot obtain memory map", status);
>  
> -    efi_arch_process_memory_map(SystemTable, efi_memmap, efi_memmap_size,
> -                                efi_mdesc_size, mdesc_ver);
> +        efi_arch_process_memory_map(SystemTable, efi_memmap, efi_memmap_size,
> +                                    efi_mdesc_size, mdesc_ver);
>  
> -    efi_arch_pre_exit_boot();
> +        efi_arch_pre_exit_boot();
> +
> +        status = efi_bs->ExitBootServices(ImageHandle, map_key);
> +        if ( status != EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER || retry )
> +            break;
> +    }

Any reason for just doing the loop at max twice? Could we iterate
more than those (say forever?) with an printk at suitable intervals
to notify the user?

>  
> -    status = efi_bs->ExitBootServices(ImageHandle, map_key);
>      if ( EFI_ERROR(status) )
>          PrintErrMesg(L"Cannot exit boot services", status);
>  
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-14 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-14 12:37 [PATCH RFC] EFI: allow retry of ExitBootServices() call Jan Beulich
2014-11-14 15:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-11-14 16:28   ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-17 13:35   ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-17 13:49     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-17 13:57       ` Jan Beulich
2014-11-14 23:17 ` Roy Franz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141114153208.GD5364@laptop.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=roy.franz@linaro.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.