From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Euan Harris <euan.harris@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: libxl: Is the nic param to libxl_network_device_add
 an (in)_out parameter?
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:08:54 +0000
Message-ID: <20141118170854.GF31225@citrix.com>
References: <20141118152848.GE31225@citrix.com>
	<1416324924.17982.21.camel@citrix.com>
	<21611.26775.594669.510363@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <21611.26775.594669.510363@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

> > I believe so, yes. The comment under "Devices" in libxl.h probably ought
> > to be adjusted to say so explicitly.
> > 
> > Ian (J) -- do you agree?
> 
> I do.  I think this applies to other kinds of device too, which might
> have unspecified parameters which get filled in.
> 
> Euan, would you like to send us a doc patch for libxl.h ?

I have sent a patch for the Devices comment.   If I come across more
functions which behave similarly I'll send more patches.

Thanks,
Euan