From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] UFS driver fixes for v3.18 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:45:30 -0800 Message-ID: <20141120064530.GA5928@infradead.org> References: <1416319366-11539-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:45115 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756033AbaKTGpa (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:45:30 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1416319366-11539-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Akinobu Mita Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Vinayak Holikatti , Dolev Raviv , Subhash Jadavani , Yaniv Gardi , Sujit Reddy Thumma , Christoph Hellwig , "James E.J. Bottomley" On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:02:44PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote: > This patch series includes two fixes for UFS driver. > > The first patch already got reviewed and it was a part of Dolev's various > fixes for UFS-PM series (http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=141405993104015), > but they are not merged scsi-queue yet. So this series also includes it. Actually that series is missing reviews for this and mother other patches. Can the UFS community please start reviewing each others patches? Thanks!