From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from heian.cn.fujitsu.com (unknown [59.151.112.132]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754366AC95 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:51:10 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,848,1406563200"; d="scan'208";a="43695997" Received: from unknown (HELO edo.cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2014 09:47:51 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by edo.cn.fujitsu.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id sAK1onUn031133; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:50:49 +0800 Received: from Fedora (10.167.226.40) by G08CNEXCHPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.181.6; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:51:08 +0800 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:51:03 +0800 From: Qian Lei To: Joe MacDonald Message-ID: <20141120095103.2f61ea12@Fedora> In-Reply-To: <20141119205646.GL6216@mentor.com> References: <1416382491-11239-1-git-send-email-qianl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20141119205646.GL6216@mentor.com> Organization: FNST X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-selinux][PATCH] ustr: Change the SRC_URI to upstream and add a new patch X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:51:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:56:47 -0500 Joe MacDonald wrote: > Thanks for the submission. Just a couple of comments. > > [[oe] [meta-selinux][PATCH] ustr: Change the SRC_URI to upstream and add a > new patch] On 14.11.19 (Wed 15:34) Qian Lei wrote: > > > Official upstream is still Ok, using it first. > > Add a new patch which is applied in Fedora20 > > As these are two unrelated issues, I think two patches would've been > appropriate with 1/2 being the one that updates the SRC_URI and 2/2 > being the c99 patch. > > You should also provide an upstream-status for the C99 patch. As you > say it came from Fedora, odds are it is already submitted upstream, so > 'pending' could be appropriate here, but I don't know. > > Finally, meta-selinux patches should go to yocto@yoctoproject.org (cc'd > here), not the openembedded-dev@ list. > > I'm fine with making the changes I described above or you can send out a > new version of the patch/patches if you like. I won't do anything with > it before tomorrow, either way, to give everyone time to have a look. > > -J. Thanks for your reply.It really help me a lot. I'll take your advice and send a new version of patches to yocto soon. Qian Lei From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 505F8E007C2; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:52:14 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-Greylist: delayed 65 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at yocto-www; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:52:12 PST Received: from heian.cn.fujitsu.com (unknown [59.151.112.132]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDDFE0071C for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 17:52:11 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,848,1406563200"; d="scan'208";a="43695997" Received: from unknown (HELO edo.cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 20 Nov 2014 09:47:51 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by edo.cn.fujitsu.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id sAK1onUn031133; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:50:49 +0800 Received: from Fedora (10.167.226.40) by G08CNEXCHPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.181.6; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:51:08 +0800 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:51:03 +0800 From: Qian Lei To: Joe MacDonald Message-ID: <20141120095103.2f61ea12@Fedora> In-Reply-To: <20141119205646.GL6216@mentor.com> References: <1416382491-11239-1-git-send-email-qianl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20141119205646.GL6216@mentor.com> Organization: FNST X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [oe] [meta-selinux][PATCH] ustr: Change the SRC_URI to upstream and add a new patch X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:52:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:56:47 -0500 Joe MacDonald wrote: > Thanks for the submission. Just a couple of comments. > > [[oe] [meta-selinux][PATCH] ustr: Change the SRC_URI to upstream and add a > new patch] On 14.11.19 (Wed 15:34) Qian Lei wrote: > > > Official upstream is still Ok, using it first. > > Add a new patch which is applied in Fedora20 > > As these are two unrelated issues, I think two patches would've been > appropriate with 1/2 being the one that updates the SRC_URI and 2/2 > being the c99 patch. > > You should also provide an upstream-status for the C99 patch. As you > say it came from Fedora, odds are it is already submitted upstream, so > 'pending' could be appropriate here, but I don't know. > > Finally, meta-selinux patches should go to yocto@yoctoproject.org (cc'd > here), not the openembedded-dev@ list. > > I'm fine with making the changes I described above or you can send out a > new version of the patch/patches if you like. I won't do anything with > it before tomorrow, either way, to give everyone time to have a look. > > -J. Thanks for your reply.It really help me a lot. I'll take your advice and send a new version of patches to yocto soon. Qian Lei