From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 2/3] omap gpmc changes for v3.19 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 12:02:41 +0100 Message-ID: <201411201202.41698.arnd@arndb.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.130]:50083 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750845AbaKTLDC (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:03:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: arm@kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 12 November 2014, Tony Lindgren wrote: > GPMC (General Purpose Memory Controller) changes for omaps. These > changes allow us to drop dependencies to bootloader timings now > that the known device tree entries have been fixed. So we can now > require proper timings to be configured and get rid of the legacy > smsc91x code. > > Note that this branch has a dependency to the related device tree > branch sent in a separate pull request as timings are now required. Does this mean you are breaking compatibility with old dtb files? Can you be more specific which machines are affected? Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 12:02:41 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL 2/3] omap gpmc changes for v3.19 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <201411201202.41698.arnd@arndb.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 12 November 2014, Tony Lindgren wrote: > GPMC (General Purpose Memory Controller) changes for omaps. These > changes allow us to drop dependencies to bootloader timings now > that the known device tree entries have been fixed. So we can now > require proper timings to be configured and get rid of the legacy > smsc91x code. > > Note that this branch has a dependency to the related device tree > branch sent in a separate pull request as timings are now required. Does this mean you are breaking compatibility with old dtb files? Can you be more specific which machines are affected? Arnd