From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] Query on CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:22:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141121132226.7ae6f75c@lilith> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zjblltju.fsf@nbsps.com>
Hello Bill,
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 11:34:45 -0500, Bill Pringlemeir
<bpringlemeir@nbsps.com> wrote:
> Originally Daniel Gutson used '-mauto-it' and then it was converted to
> '-mimplicit-it'.
Ok, so I was right in my gut(son)[1] feeling that -mauto-it was a
predecessor of -mimplicit-it -- and actually only in the first
iteration(s) of the patch that would have introduced it.
> I am not sure if '-mauto-it' exists in the wild. I have never heard of
> that option before seeing this email thread. Also my assembler says,
>
> Assembler messages:
> Error: unrecognized option -mauto-it
>
> I have built with the most recent binutils, gcc4.9.1 using crosstool-ng.
> Maybe only some non-mainline tools picked up this '-mauto-it' patch. I
> don't think it hurts to support '-mauto-it', but an assembler test
> should be done to see if it accepts the option.
I've gone through the binutils git tree, and -mauto-it is mentioned
only in a patch that fixes the gas /docs/ which erroneously mentioned
-mauto-it where it should have mentioned -mimplicit-it.
Hence, I think we should not test for -mauto-it at all, and not
mention it even.
Stefan, can you resubmit without the -mauto-it part, and renaming
AFLAGS_AUTOIT into AFLAGS_IMPLICIT_IT?
> hth,
> Bill Pringlemeir.
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
[1] I am never ashamed of doing lame puns.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-21 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-13 16:29 [U-Boot] Query on CONFIG_SYS_THUMB_BUILD Victor Ascroft
2014-11-13 20:53 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-11-14 4:30 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-14 5:43 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-11-14 6:10 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-14 14:01 ` Simon Glass
2014-11-14 15:26 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-11-15 1:56 ` Simon Glass
2014-11-15 5:26 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-15 5:38 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-15 12:30 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-11-15 22:10 ` Simon Glass
2014-11-16 7:50 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-11-17 6:28 ` Simon Glass
2014-11-18 3:32 ` Victor Ascroft
2014-11-18 4:59 ` Simon Glass
2014-11-18 12:10 ` Stefan Agner
2014-11-18 16:07 ` Stefan Agner
2014-11-18 18:37 ` Stefan Agner
2014-11-19 6:42 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-11-19 6:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2014-11-19 16:31 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2014-11-19 17:48 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-11-19 18:34 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2014-11-20 12:04 ` Albert ARIBAUD
2014-11-20 16:34 ` Bill Pringlemeir
2014-11-21 12:22 ` Albert ARIBAUD [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141121132226.7ae6f75c@lilith \
--to=albert.u.boot@aribaud.net \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.