All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
	linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 7/7] kernel: Force ACCESS_ONCE to work only on scalar types
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 12:46:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141124204614.GU5050@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwJEqMv00zkwHmp_LOg74RU3e30-oo6RaYb=yGjgGr2cg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:19:11PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > OK, how about the following?
> 
> Ugh. Disgusting.
> 
> Why the heck isn't it just "sizeof(*__vp) <= sizeof(long)"?
> 
> If the architecture has a 3-byte scalar type, then it probably has a
> 3-byte load.

Because I was allowing for the possibility of a 3-byte struct, which
as you point out below...

> > It complains if the variable is too large, for example, long long on
> > 32-bit systems or large structures.  It is OK loading from and storing
> > to small structures as well, which I am having a hard time thinking of
> > as a disadvantage.
> 
> .. but that's *exactly* the gcc bug in question. It's a word-sized
> struct that gcc loads twice.

...was a stupid thought anyway.

OK, how about the attempt below?  The initialization of __p complains
for structures and unions, but gets optimized out.

							Thanx, Paul

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

#define get_scalar_volatile_pointer(x) ({ \
	typeof(x) __maybe_unused __p = 0; \
	volatile typeof(x) *__vp = &(x); \
	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*__vp) > sizeof(long)); \
	__vp; })
#define ACCESS_ONCE(x) (*get_scalar_volatile_pointer(x))

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-24 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-24 13:03 [PATCH/RFC 0/7] ACCESS_ONCE and non-scalar accesses Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: s390: Fix ipte locking Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/7] mm: replace page table access via ACCESS_ONCE with barriers Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/7] x86: Rework ACCESS_ONCE for spinlock code Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/7] x86: Replace ACCESS_ONCE in gup with a barrier Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/7] mips: " Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/7] arm64: Replace ACCESS_ONCE for spinlock code with barriers Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 18:50   ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:03 ` [PATCH/RFC 7/7] kernel: Force ACCESS_ONCE to work only on scalar types Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 13:30   ` David Howells
2014-11-24 17:30     ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-24 18:02     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-11-24 18:35       ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-24 19:07         ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 19:14           ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-24 19:42             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-24 20:19               ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-24 20:46                 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-11-24 20:28               ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 20:04           ` David Howells
2014-11-24 20:34             ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-24 20:53               ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 21:02                 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-24 21:16                   ` Christian Borntraeger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-24 20:29 Alexei Starovoitov
2014-11-24 20:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-11-24 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-11-24 22:58 Alexei Starovoitov
2014-11-25  0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-11-25  2:28 Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141124204614.GU5050@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.