From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:09:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:35094 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27007023AbaKYMJIE9Nyp (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:09:08 +0100 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id sAPC94ql031203; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:09:04 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id sAPC92MM031202; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:09:02 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:09:02 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: James Cowgill Cc: David Daney , Markos Chandras , Aaro Koskinen , "Herrmann, Andreas" , "linux-mips@linux-mips.org" , David Daney Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: octeon: Add support for the UBNT E200 board Message-ID: <20141125120902.GD16505@linux-mips.org> References: <1416837096-52243-1-git-send-email-James.Cowgill@imgtec.com> <54736A06.9070206@gmail.com> <20141124191301.GC6796@fuloong-minipc.musicnaut.iki.fi> <20141124194611.GD6796@fuloong-minipc.musicnaut.iki.fi> <54738CCA.4090302@gmail.com> <104ADEDC18AE5E45870C06CF0304E344A50C91@LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <104ADEDC18AE5E45870C06CF0304E344A50C91@LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 44431 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:58:21AM +0000, James Cowgill wrote: > > So for all boards with bootloaders that supply a device tree, there > > should never be any reason to patch in the hacky board identifiers to > > the kernel sources. > > Yep you're right - everything does seem to work. I think I must have > messed up different kernel versions or something when I tested this > before. Sorry for the spam, you can ignore this patch. I already dropped it from patchwork yesterday. Ralf