From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: 32 bit getcpu VDSO function uses 64 bit instructions
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:08:29 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141127160829.GA26139@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417045827.16862.32.camel@otta>
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:50:27PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 09:38 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 08:11 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > > I used some 64 bit instructions when adding the 32 bit getcpu VDSO
> > > function. Fix it.
> >
> > Ouch. The symptom is a SIGILL I presume?
>
> Nope, you don't get a SIGILL when executing 64-bit instructions in
> 32-bit mode, so it'll happily just execute the instruction, doing
> a full 64-bit compare. I'm guessing that the upper 32-bits of both
> r3 and r4 contain zeros, so we're probably just getting lucky.
You will get a SIGILL if you run on 32-bit hardware.
> > Could we catch this by forcing -m32 in the CFLAGS for vdso32 ?
>
> As Segher mentioned, GCC passing -many down to the assembler means
> -m32 won't help. It was due to Anton disabling that gcc "feature",
> that this was caught.
There are extremely many complex failure cases without the -many.
Feel free to work on removing it, I won't :-)
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-27 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-26 21:11 [PATCH] powerpc: 32 bit getcpu VDSO function uses 64 bit instructions Anton Blanchard
2014-11-26 22:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2014-11-26 23:23 ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-11-26 23:28 ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-11-26 23:50 ` Peter Bergner
2014-11-27 16:08 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2014-11-27 17:41 ` Peter Bergner
2014-11-27 20:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2014-11-28 2:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-11-27 18:20 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141127160829.GA26139@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=bergner@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.