From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (relay1.mentorg.com [192.94.38.131]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC7065CA7 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 03:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-orw-fem-05.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.43]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1XvHyF-0002sW-9A from Joe_MacDonald@mentor.com ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 19:48:19 -0800 Received: from burninator (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-05.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.181.6; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 19:48:18 -0800 Received: by burninator (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 44D2D58044A; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:48:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:48:18 -0500 From: Joe MacDonald To: Armin Kuster Message-ID: <20141201034817.GU3886@mentor.com> References: <1417152844-23643-1-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1417152844-23643-1-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> X-URL: http://github.com/joeythesaint/joe-s-common-environment/tree/master X-Configuration: git://github.com/joeythesaint/joe-s-common-environment.git X-Editor: Vim-704 http://www.vim.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-networking][PATCH 0/2] two more Netkit packages X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 03:48:23 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 53111 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dIV3CY5swYZsO92m" Content-Disposition: inline --dIV3CY5swYZsO92m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey Armin, I merged netkit-ftp. Could you put together a pam-optional version of netkit-rsh? Or is that going to be a huge pain for you? I'd really like to provide a version that uses PAM if available rather than requires it. -J. [[meta-networking][PATCH 0/2] two more Netkit packages] On 14.11.27 (Thu 21= :34) Armin Kuster wrote: > Please consider these two packages for inclusion to meta-networking. > I have placed them in their own recipes location for others from the fami= ly to be added later. >=20 > Armin Kuster (2): > New package: netkit-rsh > New package: Netkit-ftp >=20 > .../netkit-ftp/files/Add_ARG_MAX_define.patch | 28 ++++++++++ > .../recipes-netkit/netkit-ftp/netkit-ftp_0.17.bb | 46 ++++++++++++++++ > .../files/rsh-redone_link_order_file.patch | 64 ++++++++++++++++= ++++++ > .../recipes-netkit/netkit-rsh/netkit-rsh_0.17.bb | 61 ++++++++++++++++= +++++ > 4 files changed, 199 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-netkit/netkit-ftp/files/Add_A= RG_MAX_define.patch > create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-netkit/netkit-ftp/netkit-ftp_= 0.17.bb > create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-netkit/netkit-rsh/files/rsh-r= edone_link_order_file.patch > create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-netkit/netkit-rsh/netkit-rsh_= 0.17.bb >=20 --=20 -Joe MacDonald. :wq --dIV3CY5swYZsO92m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUe+UBAAoJEEn8ffcsOfaW3+oH/AwAjkPhlJiHTtl71kbCtP8h it58lPdNenjy+juDO5xah8rOxhHc5sIj+0w6u6bt/+r9JFLATexiLTGe3MS3coSi pzoqh3nSdbUqlI9Dqx3D9zoCys9weAAuWUnQvsvUSS4+4z6xzbWqmA3XdVBvFRvX dn/EPJ5+sFAuvnAjgNte1ZMGSS0t6TxtBsVGS2hab3SsqfZE4ehuV/nJHMtIbVZk AArTTs5EQ1EIUEySi3G74OODgxvjngsojVHm8HL1kSpkH/l5H4b71V/QADAOqJPu q1pss7kJi7OEA/9pt2fAttz2lVBb8azxYzsc6f4PmCTcUStmpLMP3HUbq5ltalA= =KS+X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dIV3CY5swYZsO92m--