From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc: eparis@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fanotify: dont recalculate a marks mask if only the ignored mask changed
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:11:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141201091149.GC16185@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417304258-16838-2-git-send-email-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
On Sun 30-11-14 00:37:37, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> If removing bits from a marks ignored mask, the concerning inodes/vfsmounts
> mask is not affected. So dont recalculate it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Looks good. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> index 03a0dd1..3afd8bb 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
> @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static __u32 fanotify_mark_remove_from_mask(struct fsnotify_mark *fsn_mark,
> unsigned int flags,
> int *destroy)
> {
> - __u32 oldmask;
> + __u32 oldmask = 0;
> __u32 new_mask;
> __u32 new_ignored;
>
> @@ -496,8 +496,8 @@ static __u32 fanotify_mark_remove_from_mask(struct fsnotify_mark *fsn_mark,
> oldmask = fsn_mark->mask;
> fsnotify_set_mark_mask_locked(fsn_mark, (oldmask & ~mask));
> } else {
> - oldmask = fsn_mark->ignored_mask;
> - fsnotify_set_mark_ignored_mask_locked(fsn_mark, (oldmask & ~mask));
> + __u32 tmask = fsn_mark->ignored_mask & ~mask;
> + fsnotify_set_mark_ignored_mask_locked(fsn_mark, tmask);
> }
> new_mask = fsn_mark->mask;
> new_ignored = fsn_mark->ignored_mask;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-01 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-29 23:37 [PATCH 1/3] fanotify: only destroy mark when both mask and ignored_mask are cleared Lino Sanfilippo
2014-11-29 23:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] fanotify: dont recalculate a marks mask if only the ignored mask changed Lino Sanfilippo
2014-12-01 9:11 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2014-11-29 23:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] fanotify: fix inconsistent behaviour regarding flag FAN_ONDIR Lino Sanfilippo
2014-12-01 10:05 ` Jan Kara
2014-12-02 2:03 ` Lino Sanfilippo
2014-12-01 9:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] fanotify: only destroy mark when both mask and ignored_mask are cleared Jan Kara
2014-12-02 2:11 ` Lino Sanfilippo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141201091149.GC16185@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.