Re: [Patch v2 2/2] gpio: Document GPIO hogging mechanism

[Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>]

Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> wrote on Fri [2014-Nov-28 16:31:19 +0900]:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com> wrote:
> > Add GPIO hogging documentation to gpio.txt
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v1:
> >  * Split the devicetree bindings documentation in its own patch.
> >
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> > index 3fb8f53..82755e2 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt
> > @@ -103,6 +103,24 @@ Every GPIO controller node must contain both an empty "gpio-controller"
> >  property, and a #gpio-cells integer property, which indicates the number of
> >  cells in a gpio-specifier.
> >
> > +The GPIO chip may contain GPIO hog definitions. GPIO hogging is a mechanism
> > +providing automatic GPIO request and configuration as part of the
> > +gpio-controller's driver probe function.
> > +
> > +Each GPIO hog definition is represented as a child node of the GPIO controller.
> > +Required properties:
> > +- gpio-hog: a property specifying that this child node represent a gpio-hog.
> > +- gpios: store the gpio information (id, flags, ...). Shall contain the
> > +  number of cells specified in its parent node (GPIO controller node).
> > +- input: a property specifying to set the GPIO direction as input.
> > +- output-high: a property specifying to set the GPIO direction to output with
> > +  the value high.
> > +- output-low: a property specifying to set the GPIO direction to output with
> > +  the value low.
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- line-name: the GPIO label name. If not present the node name is used.
> > +
> >  Example of two SOC GPIO banks defined as gpio-controller nodes:
> >
> >         qe_pio_a: gpio-controller@1400 {
> > @@ -110,6 +128,13 @@ Example of two SOC GPIO banks defined as gpio-controller nodes:
> >                 reg = <0x1400 0x18>;
> >                 gpio-controller;
> >                 #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > +
> > +               line_b: line_b {
> 
> Mmm what is the label used for? Can this node ever be referenced from
> somewhere else?

It's not used for anything else as far as I know other than as the line-name to be assigned to the gpio being hogged.
I guess you agree with Linus and should make the line-name mandatory and remove the label altogether?

I was trying to keep the verbosity to a minimum so as to have the possibilty to keep everything on a single line when possible.

Benoit