From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 49/47] libext2fs: don't report garbage inodes with really large inodes Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 22:18:18 -0500 Message-ID: <20141203031818.GO13618@thunk.org> References: <20141107215042.883.49888.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20141127000136.GP10043@birch.djwong.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Darrick J. Wong" Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:36032 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750969AbaLCDSZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2014 22:18:25 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141127000136.GP10043@birch.djwong.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:01:36PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > If the inode size is large enough that there are fewer than two inodes > per block, don't report an inode checksum failure as a garbage inode > during the scan because the "more than half are broken" criteria that > we use to decide if a block of inodes is garbage doesn't really apply. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Applied, thanks. - Ted