From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux@eikelenboom.it
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 7/7] xen/pciback: Restore configuration space when detaching from a guest.
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:52:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141203155208.GC3081@laptop.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <547E4736.5000303@oracle.com>
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 06:11:50PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/21/2014 05:17 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >The commit "xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding." was using
> >the version of pci_reset_function which would lock the device lock.
> >That is no good as we can dead-lock. As such we swapped to using
> >the lock-less version and requiring that the callers
> >of 'pcistub_put_pci_dev' take the device lock. And as such
> >this bug got exposed.
> >
> >Using the lock-less version is OK, except that we tried to
> >use 'pci_restore_state' after the lock-less version of
> >__pci_reset_function_locked - which won't work as 'state_saved'
> >is set to false. Said 'state_saved' is a toggle boolean that
> >is to be used by the sequence of a) pci_save_state/pci_restore_state
> >or b) pci_load_and_free_saved_state/pci_restore_state. We don't
> >want to use a) as the guest might have messed up the PCI
> >configuration space and we want it to revert to the state
> >when the PCI device was binded to us. Therefore we pick
> >b) to restore the configuration space.
>
>
> Doesn't this all mean that patch 1/7 broke pcistub_put_pci_dev()?
It fixed it (there was a deadlock there).
But the fix to the dead-lock exposed this bug.
One could say that 1/7 broke it because it never worked in the
first place, but now that it works (thanks to #1) - it did not
work right?
Squashing the patches together is a bit too much I fear.
>
> -boris
>
>
> >
> >We restore from our 'golden' version of PCI configuration space, when an:
> > - Device is unbinded from pciback
> > - Device is detached from a guest.
> >
> >Reported-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
> >Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> >---
> > drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> >index 843a2ba..eb8b58e 100644
> >--- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> >+++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> >@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static void pcistub_device_release(struct kref *kref)
> > */
> > __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> > if (pci_load_and_free_saved_state(dev, &dev_data->pci_saved_state))
> >- dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> >+ dev_info(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> > else
> > pci_restore_state(dev);
> >@@ -257,6 +257,8 @@ void pcistub_put_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > {
> > struct pcistub_device *psdev, *found_psdev = NULL;
> > unsigned long flags;
> >+ struct xen_pcibk_dev_data *dev_data;
> >+ int ret;
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&pcistub_devices_lock, flags);
> >@@ -279,9 +281,19 @@ void pcistub_put_pci_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > * (so it's ready for the next domain)
> > */
> > device_lock_assert(&dev->dev);
> >- __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> >- pci_restore_state(dev);
> >-
> >+ dev_data = pci_get_drvdata(dev);
> >+ ret = pci_load_saved_state(dev, dev_data->pci_saved_state);
> >+ if (ret < 0)
> >+ dev_warn(&dev->dev, "Could not reload PCI state\n");
> >+ else {
> >+ __pci_reset_function_locked(dev);
> >+ /*
> >+ * The usual sequence is pci_save_state & pci_restore_state
> >+ * but the guest might have messed the configuration space up.
> >+ * Use the initial version (when device was bound to us).
> >+ */
> >+ pci_restore_state(dev);
> >+ }
> > /* This disables the device. */
> > xen_pcibk_reset_device(dev);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-03 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-21 22:17 [PATCH v4] Fixes for PCI backend for 3.19 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] xen/pciback: Don't deadlock when unbinding Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] driver core: Provide an wrapper around the mutex to do lockdep warnings Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] xen/pciback: Include the domain id if removing the device whilst still in use Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] xen/pciback: Print out the domain owning the device Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] xen/pciback: Remove tons of dereferences Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] PCI: Expose pci_load_saved_state for public consumption Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] xen/pciback: Restore configuration space when detaching from a guest Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-12-01 14:14 ` David Vrabel
2014-12-01 14:14 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-12-01 21:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-12-01 21:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-12-02 23:11 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-12-02 23:11 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2014-12-03 15:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2014-12-03 15:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-11-21 22:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-12-02 10:10 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] Fixes for PCI backend for 3.19 Jan Beulich
2014-12-02 15:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-12-02 15:09 ` Jan Beulich
2014-12-02 15:09 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2014-12-02 15:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-12-02 10:10 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141203155208.GC3081@laptop.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.