From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-xen-4.5 1/3] tools/hotplug: distclean
 target should remove files generated by configure
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 15:36:16 -0500
Message-ID: <20141203203616.GA8802@laptop.dumpdata.com>
References: <1417533390-29035-1-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
	<1417533390-29035-2-git-send-email-daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
	<20141202183620.GE32385@laptop.dumpdata.com>
	<20141203155353.GN16236@olila.local.net-space.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>) id 1XwGfZ-0003FK-PL
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 20:37:05 +0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141203155353.GN16236@olila.local.net-space.pl>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>, abe@debian.org, pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
Cc: keir@xen.org, ian.campbell@citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, jbeulich@suse.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 04:53:53PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 01:36:20PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:16:28PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
> >
> > This usage scenario which I can see this being useful (and
> > I've tripped over this) is when you rebuild a new version
> > from the same repo. As in, this affects developers, but
> > not end-users and not distros. But perhaps I am missing
> > one scenario?
> >
> > As such I would lean towards deferring this (and the other
> > two) to Xen 4.6.
> 
> As I know Debian build system sometimes complain if make distclean
> does not leave build tree in distclean state (read "state before
> configure" != "state after distclean"). It means that from
> distros point of view we should apply this patch. However,
> other two are not required and we can deffer them to Xen 4.6.

Cc-ing Axel and Debian Xen Team.
> 
> Daniel