All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] x86/spinlock: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 16:10:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141204001028.GZ25340@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1417645821-54731-4-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 11:30:15PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
> example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
> accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)
> 
> Change the spinlock code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index 9295016..12a69b4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static __always_inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
>  		unsigned count = SPIN_THRESHOLD;
> 
>  		do {
> -			if (ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets.head) == inc.tail)
> +			if (READ_ONCE(lock->tickets.head) == inc.tail)
>  				goto out;
>  			cpu_relax();
>  		} while (--count);
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static __always_inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
>  {
>  	arch_spinlock_t old, new;
> 
> -	old.tickets = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets);
> +	old.tickets = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets);
>  	if (old.tickets.head != (old.tickets.tail & ~TICKET_SLOWPATH_FLAG))
>  		return 0;
> 
> @@ -162,14 +162,14 @@ static __always_inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> 
>  static inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
>  {
> -	struct __raw_tickets tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets);
> +	struct __raw_tickets tmp = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets);
> 
>  	return tmp.tail != tmp.head;
>  }
> 
>  static inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
>  {
> -	struct __raw_tickets tmp = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->tickets);
> +	struct __raw_tickets tmp = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets);
> 
>  	return (__ticket_t)(tmp.tail - tmp.head) > TICKET_LOCK_INC;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.9.3
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-04  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-03 22:30 [PATCHv4 0/9] ACCESS_ONCE and non-scalar accesses Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-03 22:30 ` [PATCH 1/9] kernel: Provide READ_ONCE and ASSIGN_ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-04  0:07   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-04  9:24     ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-04 14:41       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-03 22:30 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE or barriers Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-04  0:09   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-03 22:30 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/spinlock: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-04  0:10   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-12-03 22:30 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/gup: " Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-04  0:10   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-03 22:30 ` [PATCH 5/9] mips/gup: " Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-04  0:11   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-03 22:30 ` [PATCH 6/9] arm64/spinlock: Replace ACCESS_ONCE READ_ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-04  0:11   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-03 22:30 ` [PATCH 7/9] arm/spinlock: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-04  0:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-03 22:30 ` [PATCH 8/9] s390/kvm: REPLACE " Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-04  0:12   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-03 22:30 ` [PATCH 9/9] kernel: tighten rules for ACCESS ONCE Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-04  0:16   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-04  9:28     ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-04 14:41       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-12-04 15:24 ` [PATCHv4 0/9] ACCESS_ONCE and non-scalar accesses Christian Borntraeger
2014-12-04 23:40 ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141204001028.GZ25340@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.