From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 06:47:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] R-Car Gen2 removal and cleanups Message-Id: <20141204064731.GA25651@verge.net.au> List-Id: References: <1417538146-23350-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> In-Reply-To: <1417538146-23350-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 11:44:29PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Geert, > > On Tuesday 02 December 2014 22:06:49 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > This patch series remove the Lager legacy and reference board files from > > > the kernel. It builds upon two patches previously posted by Magnus and > > > updated to removal left-overs. > > > > > > The rationale for the change, beside keeping the ARM SoC maintainers > > > happy, is that the Lager board is now correctly supported using DT boot > > > and generic code only, so there's no reason to keep board files along. > > > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > > > > The second reason to repost the patches is to include a pet peeve of mine > > > that I've been carrying in my local branches for too long. The last two > > > patches update the Lager and Koelsch DT files to finally rename the two > > > serial ports to ttySC0 and ttySC1. > > > > I'm not opposed to this change. IIRC, this has been a contentious issue in the past. I will confer with Magnus to make sure we are all happy with this change. > > > The patches are targeted at v3.20, as they depend on the "ARM: shmobile: > > > lager: Remove DU platform device" patch scheduled for merge in v3.19-rc1 > > > through the DRM tree. > > > > Given the issues with armadillo-legacy (and perhaps some other -legacy > > platform(s)?) in -next (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/2/339), we may have to > > accelerate kicking out -legacy... > > We've known for a long time that -legacy is doomed. Now it's a question of > priorities :-) Zero argument there.