From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: suppress build warning
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 08:30:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141204163032.GA29076@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8vH9McTLVSWhQZun04AP7SZ7wGHeobBK1hA+EKn5fYgKw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:13:00PM +0000, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 December 2014 14:38:30 Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> >> this patch fixes following build warning:
> >>
> >> drivers/misc/ioc4.c: In function ‘ioc4_probe’:
> >> drivers/misc/ioc4.c:194:16: warning: ‘start’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> >> period = (end - start) /
> >> ^
> >> drivers/misc/ioc4.c:148:11: note: ‘start’ was declared here
> >> uint64_t start, end, period;
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
> >
> > Please explain why the compiler thinks there is a bug, why you
> > are sure that there isn't, and why you picked '0' as the
> > initialization value.
> >
> Its a false positive, to suppress the warning '0' was picked.
Are you _sure_ it's a false positive? That odd do/while loop looks like
it might just not ever initialize the start variable, are you sure the
logic there is correct?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-04 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-04 14:38 [PATCH] misc: suppress build warning Lad, Prabhakar
2014-12-04 14:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-04 15:13 ` Prabhakar Lad
2014-12-04 16:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2014-12-05 7:37 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141204163032.GA29076@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.