From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] toolstack-based approach to pvhvm guest kexec Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:24:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20141211142428.GA19820@aepfle.de> References: <1417626981-8432-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta4.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz4fY-00033M-OR for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:24:41 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1417626981-8432-1-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: Wei Liu , Andrew Jones , Keir Fraser , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , Andrew Cooper , Ian Jackson , Tim Deegan , David Vrabel , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, Dec 03, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > When a PVHVM linux guest performs kexec there are lots of things which > require taking care of: > - shared info, vcpu_info > - grants > - event channels > - ... > Instead of taking care of all these things we can rebuild the domain > performing kexec from scratch doing so-called soft-reboot. How does this approach handle ballooned pages? >>From the guests point of view they are always there, just claimed by the balloon driver. The new kernel does not have that driver nor does its driver have the knowledge which pages the old kernel gave back to Xen. After a brief look none of the patches seem to deal with that. Olaf