From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chao Peng Subject: Re: Cache Allocation Technology(CAT) design for XEN Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:47:51 +0800 Message-ID: <20141215084751.GA3105@pengc-linux.bj.intel.com> References: <1418387277-4613-1-git-send-email-chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com> <548B0389.5040107@citrix.com> Reply-To: Chao Peng Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <548B0389.5040107@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper Cc: keir@xen.org, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com, Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, will.auld@intel.com, JBeulich@suse.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com, dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:02:33PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 12/12/14 12:27, Chao Peng wrote: > > Hi all, we plan to bring Intel CAT into XEN. This is the initial > > design for that. Comments/suggestions are welcome. > > > > Fantastic - this is a very clear and well presented document. In terms > of a plan of action, it looks fine. Thank you for review. > > >From my understanding, CAT is a largely orthogonal to CMT, but will > share some of the base PSR infrastructure in Xen? > Yes, from functional perspective, they are independent features. But they do share some common codes and also have similar designs in XEN. Chao > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel