All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Anshuman Aggarwal <anshuman.aggarwal@gmail.com>
Cc: Mdadm <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Split RAID: Proposal for archival RAID using incremental batch checksum
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 08:49:21 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141217084921.360ca442@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK-d5db_ubRobL=uiia_9yOFA0PMovptAG8O+Y17ORT_--FsQg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1928 bytes --]

On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:55:15 +0530 Anshuman Aggarwal
<anshuman.aggarwal@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2 December 2014 at 17:26, Anshuman Aggarwal
> <anshuman.aggarwal@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It works! (Atleast on a sample 5 MB device with 5 x 1MB partitions :-)
> > will find more space on my drives and do a larger test but don't see
> > why it shouldn't work)
> > Here are the following caveats (and questions):
> > - Neil, like you pointed out, the power of 2 chunk size will probably
> > need a code change (in the kernel or only in the userspace tool?)

In the kernel too.

> >     - Any performance or other reasons why a terabyte size chunk may
> > not be feasible?

Not that I can think of.

> > - Implications of safe_mode_delay
> >     - Would the metadata be updated on the block device be written to
> > and the parity device as well?

Probably.  Hard to give a specific answer to vague question.

> >     - If the drive  fails which is the same as the drive being written
> > to, would that lack of metadata updates to the other devices affect
> > reconstruction?

Again, to give a precise answer, a detailed question is needed.  Obviously
any change would have to made in such a way to ensure that things which
needed to work, did work.


> > - Adding new devices (is it possible to move the parity to the disk
> > being added? How does device addition work for RAID4 ...is it added as
> > a zero-ed out device with parity disk remaining the same)

RAID5 or RAID6 with ALGORITHM_PARITY_0 puts the parity on the early devices.
Currently if you add a device to such an array ...... I'm not sure what it
will do.  It should be possible to make it just write zeros out.


NeilBrown


> >
> >
> 
> Neil, sorry to try to bump this thread. Could you please look over the
> questions and address the points on the remaining items that can make
> it a working solution? Thanks


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 811 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-16 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-29  7:15 Split RAID: Proposal for archival RAID using incremental batch checksum Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-29  7:32 ` Roman Mamedov
2014-10-29  8:31   ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-29  9:05 ` NeilBrown
2014-10-29  9:25   ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-29 19:27     ` Ethan Wilson
2014-10-30 14:57       ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-30 17:25         ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2014-10-31 11:05           ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-31 14:25             ` Matt Garman
2014-11-01 12:55             ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2014-11-06  2:29               ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-10-30 15:00     ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-03  5:52       ` NeilBrown
2014-11-03 18:04         ` Piergiorgio Sartor
2014-11-06  2:24         ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-24  7:29         ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-24 22:50           ` NeilBrown
2014-11-26  6:24             ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-01 16:00               ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-01 16:34                 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-01 21:46                   ` NeilBrown
2014-12-02 11:56                     ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-16 16:25                       ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-12-16 21:49                         ` NeilBrown [this message]
2014-12-17  6:40                           ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2015-01-06 11:40                             ` Anshuman Aggarwal
     [not found] ` <CAJvUf-BktH_E6jb5d94VuMVEBf_Be4i_8u_kBYU52Df1cu0gmg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-11-01  5:36   ` Anshuman Aggarwal
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-21 10:15 Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-21 11:41 ` Greg Freemyer
2014-11-21 18:48   ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-22 13:17     ` Greg Freemyer
2014-11-22 13:22       ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-22 14:03         ` Greg Freemyer
2014-11-22 14:43           ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-22 14:54             ` Greg Freemyer
2014-11-24  5:36               ` SandeepKsinha
2014-11-24  6:48                 ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-24 13:19                   ` Greg Freemyer
2014-11-24 17:28                     ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-24 18:10                       ` Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
2014-11-25  4:56                       ` Greg Freemyer
2014-11-27 17:50                         ` Anshuman Aggarwal
2014-11-27 18:31                           ` Greg Freemyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141217084921.360ca442@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=anshuman.aggarwal@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.