Re: [Xenomai] [xenomai-forge] timer-internal consume a lot of cpu

[Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 03:58:52PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2014-12-18 15:12, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > Otherwise, have you tried some alternate libc, such as musl:
> > http://www.musl-libc.org/
> > 
> > The following blog:
> > http://ewontfix.com/
> > 
> > Seems to show that the musl maintainers try and report glibc bugs
> > and avoid them in their implementation.
> > 
> > I have not tried xenomai with musl at all, so, maybe it does not
> > even compile. But maybe just compiling a testcase for the condvar
> > issue with that libc would help know if it has the same issue or
> > not.
> 
> Well, like with many of those "light-weight" re-implementations, the are
> "small" issues with bits required for real-time:
> 
> http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/thread/pthread_mutexattr_setprotocol.c

On the other hand, no implementation with a clear ENOTSUPP is better
than a partial and buggy implementation that can not be trusted anyway.

-- 
					    Gilles.