From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/8] ARM: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like interface Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 08:29:58 -0600 Message-ID: <20141229142958.GA10746@kahuna> References: <1419331716-8972-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <1419331716-8972-3-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20141223170613.GM23854@atomide.com> <5499A2B4.2080909@ti.com> <549FEABA.10206@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <549FEABA.10206@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz Figa Cc: Tony Lindgren , Marek Szyprowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Kyungmin Park , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Russell King - ARM Linux , Kukjin Kim , lauraa@codeaurora.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, drake@endlessm.com, loeliger@gmail.com, Mark Rutland , khilman@linaro.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 20:34-20141228, Tomasz Figa wrote: > May I ask you (or anyone else working on OMAP) to try to figure out > what the issue is? It is stopping L2 cache support for Exynos4 being http://slexy.org/view/s2BnzxVglj Took a register dump and compared -> Got the same dump http://slexy.org/view/s21YRHpzeW . Basically, this implies: possible sequence change broke AM437x or some secure function call (which i have'nt dumped). Is it possible to break up this patch into easier patches? -- Regards, Nishanth Menon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 08:29:58 -0600 Subject: [PATCH v10 2/8] ARM: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like interface In-Reply-To: <549FEABA.10206@gmail.com> References: <1419331716-8972-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <1419331716-8972-3-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20141223170613.GM23854@atomide.com> <5499A2B4.2080909@ti.com> <549FEABA.10206@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20141229142958.GA10746@kahuna> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 20:34-20141228, Tomasz Figa wrote: > May I ask you (or anyone else working on OMAP) to try to figure out > what the issue is? It is stopping L2 cache support for Exynos4 being http://slexy.org/view/s2BnzxVglj Took a register dump and compared -> Got the same dump http://slexy.org/view/s21YRHpzeW . Basically, this implies: possible sequence change broke AM437x or some secure function call (which i have'nt dumped). Is it possible to break up this patch into easier patches? -- Regards, Nishanth Menon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752334AbaL2ObD (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2014 09:31:03 -0500 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:37545 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752283AbaL2Oa6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2014 09:30:58 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 08:29:58 -0600 From: Nishanth Menon To: Tomasz Figa CC: Tony Lindgren , Marek Szyprowski , , , Kyungmin Park , , , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Russell King - ARM Linux , Kukjin Kim , , , , , Mark Rutland , Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/8] ARM: l2c: Refactor the driver to use commit-like interface Message-ID: <20141229142958.GA10746@kahuna> References: <1419331716-8972-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <1419331716-8972-3-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20141223170613.GM23854@atomide.com> <5499A2B4.2080909@ti.com> <549FEABA.10206@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <549FEABA.10206@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 20:34-20141228, Tomasz Figa wrote: > May I ask you (or anyone else working on OMAP) to try to figure out > what the issue is? It is stopping L2 cache support for Exynos4 being http://slexy.org/view/s2BnzxVglj Took a register dump and compared -> Got the same dump http://slexy.org/view/s21YRHpzeW . Basically, this implies: possible sequence change broke AM437x or some secure function call (which i have'nt dumped). Is it possible to break up this patch into easier patches? -- Regards, Nishanth Menon