From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Fix smp typo
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:02:02 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141231020202.GN11609@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1419757883-4423-2-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 01:11:16AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Good catch, queued for 3.20.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> index 70a09f8..7086f83 100644
> --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> @@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ In summary:
> However, they do -not- guarantee any other sort of ordering:
> Not prior loads against later loads, nor prior stores against
> later anything. If you need these other forms of ordering,
> - use smb_rmb(), smp_wmb(), or, in the case of prior stores and
> + use smp_rmb(), smp_wmb(), or, in the case of prior stores and
> later loads, smp_mb().
>
> (*) If both legs of the "if" statement begin with identical stores
> --
> 2.1.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-31 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-28 9:11 [PATCH 0/8] locking: Various updates Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28 9:11 ` [PATCH 1/8] Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: Fix smp typo Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-31 2:02 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-12-28 9:11 ` [PATCH 2/8] locking/mutex: Get rid of use_ww_cxt param in common paths Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28 16:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-12-28 18:12 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28 9:11 ` [PATCH 3/8] locking/mutex: Checking the stamp is ww only Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28 9:11 ` [PATCH 4/8] locking/mutex: Delete useless comment Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28 9:11 ` [PATCH 5/8] locking/mutex: Introduce ww_mutex_set_context_slowpath Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28 9:11 ` [PATCH 6/8] locking/mcs: Better differentiate between mcs variants Davidlohr Bueso
2015-01-14 14:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-01-14 15:55 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-01-14 14:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-12-28 9:11 ` [PATCH 7/8] locking: Use [READ,ASSIGN]_ONCE() for non-scalar types Davidlohr Bueso
2014-12-28 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-12-28 9:11 ` [PATCH 8/8] locking/osq: No need for load/acquire when acquire-polling Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141231020202.GN11609@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.