From: "kevinnma(马文霜)" <kevinnma@tencent.com>
To: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: pbonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix irq route entries exceed KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 03:45:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201412311145449265941@tencent.com> (raw)
Last month, we experienced several guests crash(6cores-8cores),qemu logs
display the following messages:
qemu-system-x86_64: /build/qemu-2.1.2/kvm-all.c:976:
kvm_irqchip_commit_routes: Assertion `ret == 0' failed.
After analysis and verification, we can confirm it's irq-balance
daemon(in guest) leads to the assertion failure.So start a 8 core guest
with two disks, execute the following scripts will reproduce the BUG quickly:
vda_irq_num=25
vdb_irq_num=27
while [ 1 ]
do
for irq in {1,2,4,8,10,20,40,80}
do
echo $irq > /proc/irq/$vda_irq_num/smp_affinity
echo $irq > /proc/irq/$vdb_irq_num/smp_affinity
dd if=/dev/vda of=/dev/zero bs=4K count=100 iflag=direct
dd if=/dev/vdb of=/dev/zero bs=4K count=100 iflag=direct
done
done
QEMU setup static irq route entries in kvm_pc_setup_irq_routing(),PIC and
IOAPIC share the first 15 GSI numbers,take up 23 GSI numbers,but take up 38
irq route entries.When change irq smp_affinity in guest,a dynamic route
entry may be setup,the current logic is:if allocate GSI number succeeds,
a new route entry can be added.The available dynamic GSI numbers is
1021(KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES-23),but available irq route entries is only
986(KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES-38),GSI numbers greater than route entries.
irq-balance's behavior will eventually leads to total irq route entries
exceed KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES,ioctl(KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING) fail and
kvm_irqchip_commit_routes() trigger assertion failure.
This patch fix the BUG.
Signed-off-by: Wenshuang Ma <kevinnma@tencent.com>
---
kvm-all.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
index 18cc6b4..f47e1b1 100644
--- a/kvm-all.c
+++ b/kvm-all.c
@@ -1123,6 +1123,17 @@ static int kvm_irqchip_get_virq(KVMState *s)
int i, bit;
bool retry = true;
+ /*
+ * PIC and IOAPIC share the first 15 GSI numbers,available GSI
+ * numbers greater than IRQ route entries. If allocate GSI number
+ * succeeds, a new route entry can be added, so total IRQ route
+ * enties can exceed gsi_count, flush dynamic MSI entries when
+ * IRQ route entries arrive gsi_count.
+ */
+ if (!s->direct_msi && s->irq_routes->nr == s->gsi_count) {
+ kvm_flush_dynamic_msi_routes(s);
+ }
+
again:
/* Return the lowest unused GSI in the bitmap */
for (i = 0; i < max_words; i++) {
--
1.7.1
next reply other threads:[~2014-12-31 3:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-31 3:45 kevinnma(马文霜) [this message]
2015-01-03 17:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix irq route entries exceed KVM_MAX_IRQ_ROUTES William Dauchy
2015-01-08 3:28 ` [Qemu-devel] Ping " kevinnma(马文霜)
2015-01-08 8:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-01-08 9:00 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201412311145449265941@tencent.com \
--to=kevinnma@tencent.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.