From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>,
Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: omap-intc: improve IRQ handler
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 13:32:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150102213250.GG3298@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420224433-27001-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com>
* Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [150102 10:50]:
> as it turns out the current IRQ number will
> *always* be available from SIR register which
> renders the reads of PENDING registers as plain
> unnecessary overhead.
>
> In order to catch any situation where SIR reads
> as zero, we're adding a WARN() to turn it into
> a very verbose error and users actually report
> it.
>
> With this patch average running time of
> omap_intc_handle_irq() reduced from about 28.5us
> to 19.8us as measured by the kernel function
> profiler.
That's a nice improvment for an interrupt controller :)
> Tested with BeagleBoneBlack Rev A5C.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> ---
>
> Before applying, it would be very nice to get reports
> from other folks on different platforms, specially OMAP2/3
> ones which I don't have (easy) access.
Seems to behave just fine on omap2 and 3 here, gave it
a quick try on n800, n900, omap3-ldp and 37xx-evm:
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Regards,
Tony
> drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c | 35 +++++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c
> index 28718d3..a2da6d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c
> @@ -315,37 +315,12 @@ static int __init omap_init_irq(u32 base, struct device_node *node)
> static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry
> omap_intc_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - u32 irqnr = 0;
> - int handled_irq = 0;
> - int i;
> -
> - do {
> - for (i = 0; i < omap_nr_pending; i++) {
> - irqnr = intc_readl(INTC_PENDING_IRQ0 + (0x20 * i));
> - if (irqnr)
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> -out:
> - if (!irqnr)
> - break;
> -
> - irqnr = intc_readl(INTC_SIR);
> - irqnr &= ACTIVEIRQ_MASK;
> + u32 irqnr;
>
> - if (irqnr) {
> - handle_domain_irq(domain, irqnr, regs);
> - handled_irq = 1;
> - }
> - } while (irqnr);
> -
> - /*
> - * If an irq is masked or deasserted while active, we will
> - * keep ending up here with no irq handled. So remove it from
> - * the INTC with an ack.
> - */
> - if (!handled_irq)
> - omap_ack_irq(NULL);
> + irqnr = intc_readl(INTC_SIR);
> + irqnr &= ACTIVEIRQ_MASK;
> + WARN(!irqnr, "Spuriour IRQ ?\n");
> + handle_domain_irq(domain, irqnr, regs);
> }
>
> void __init omap2_init_irq(void)
> --
> 2.2.0
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip: omap-intc: improve IRQ handler
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 13:32:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150102213250.GG3298@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420224433-27001-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com>
* Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> [150102 10:50]:
> as it turns out the current IRQ number will
> *always* be available from SIR register which
> renders the reads of PENDING registers as plain
> unnecessary overhead.
>
> In order to catch any situation where SIR reads
> as zero, we're adding a WARN() to turn it into
> a very verbose error and users actually report
> it.
>
> With this patch average running time of
> omap_intc_handle_irq() reduced from about 28.5us
> to 19.8us as measured by the kernel function
> profiler.
That's a nice improvment for an interrupt controller :)
> Tested with BeagleBoneBlack Rev A5C.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
> ---
>
> Before applying, it would be very nice to get reports
> from other folks on different platforms, specially OMAP2/3
> ones which I don't have (easy) access.
Seems to behave just fine on omap2 and 3 here, gave it
a quick try on n800, n900, omap3-ldp and 37xx-evm:
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Regards,
Tony
> drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c | 35 +++++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c
> index 28718d3..a2da6d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c
> @@ -315,37 +315,12 @@ static int __init omap_init_irq(u32 base, struct device_node *node)
> static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry
> omap_intc_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - u32 irqnr = 0;
> - int handled_irq = 0;
> - int i;
> -
> - do {
> - for (i = 0; i < omap_nr_pending; i++) {
> - irqnr = intc_readl(INTC_PENDING_IRQ0 + (0x20 * i));
> - if (irqnr)
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> -out:
> - if (!irqnr)
> - break;
> -
> - irqnr = intc_readl(INTC_SIR);
> - irqnr &= ACTIVEIRQ_MASK;
> + u32 irqnr;
>
> - if (irqnr) {
> - handle_domain_irq(domain, irqnr, regs);
> - handled_irq = 1;
> - }
> - } while (irqnr);
> -
> - /*
> - * If an irq is masked or deasserted while active, we will
> - * keep ending up here with no irq handled. So remove it from
> - * the INTC with an ack.
> - */
> - if (!handled_irq)
> - omap_ack_irq(NULL);
> + irqnr = intc_readl(INTC_SIR);
> + irqnr &= ACTIVEIRQ_MASK;
> + WARN(!irqnr, "Spuriour IRQ ?\n");
> + handle_domain_irq(domain, irqnr, regs);
> }
>
> void __init omap2_init_irq(void)
> --
> 2.2.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-02 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-02 18:47 [PATCH] irqchip: omap-intc: improve IRQ handler Felipe Balbi
2015-01-02 18:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-02 21:32 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2015-01-02 21:32 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-02 21:39 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-02 21:39 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-02 22:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Felipe Balbi
2015-01-02 22:18 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-19 21:34 ` [PATCH] " Tony Lindgren
2015-01-19 21:34 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-07-15 8:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-07-15 8:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-07-15 12:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-15 12:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-20 16:44 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-07-20 16:44 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150102213250.GG3298@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.