From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] ARM: l2c: OMAP4/AM437x: Additional register programming support.\ Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 09:39:30 -0600 Message-ID: <20150103153930.GA26181@kahuna> References: <1420220628-23742-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <54A6E79E.7010203@oracle.com> <54A6F5C8.2050008@ti.com> <20150103002317.GH3298@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:45343 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750984AbbACPkJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2015 10:40:09 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz Figa Cc: Tony Lindgren , "santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com" , Russell King , Santosh , linux-omap , linux-kernel , linux-arm-kernel , Marek Szyprowski , Sekhar Nori On 15:42-20150103, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Indeed, as I figured out in the original thread about this issue, > additional patch fixing code unaffected by my series (besides changing > the condition which triggers calling it) is necessary. Namely, the > affected 4 registers need to be written using the write_sec wrapper, > instead of using writel*() directly. > Agreed. Would you like to post a patch (independent) of your series to address this - sounds like a fix that should go in independent of your original series. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 09:39:30 -0600 Subject: [PATCH V2 0/2] ARM: l2c: OMAP4/AM437x: Additional register programming support.\ In-Reply-To: References: <1420220628-23742-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <54A6E79E.7010203@oracle.com> <54A6F5C8.2050008@ti.com> <20150103002317.GH3298@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20150103153930.GA26181@kahuna> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 15:42-20150103, Tomasz Figa wrote: > Indeed, as I figured out in the original thread about this issue, > additional patch fixing code unaffected by my series (besides changing > the condition which triggers calling it) is necessary. Namely, the > affected 4 registers need to be written using the write_sec wrapper, > instead of using writel*() directly. > Agreed. Would you like to post a patch (independent) of your series to address this - sounds like a fix that should go in independent of your original series. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon