From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] VT-d: extend XSA-59 workaround Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 11:26:34 -0500 Message-ID: <20150105162634.GK12923@l.oracle.com> References: <5493F0870200007800050E47@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8AUN-0002Oq-Hl for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 16:26:43 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5493F0870200007800050E47@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Yang Z Zhang , xen-devel , Kevin Tian , Donald D Dugger List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 08:31:51AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote: > The endless story continues. Intel maintainers, are you folks OK with these patches? >>From my perspective: Release-Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > 1: make XSA-59 workaround fully cover XeonE5/E7 v2 > 2: extend XSA-59 workaround to XeonE5 v3 (Haswell) > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel