From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sylvain.rochet@finsecur.com (Sylvain Rochet) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 15:25:28 +0100 Subject: AT91 slow clock mode regression/fixes, improvement proposal In-Reply-To: References: <20141218203904.GA25215@gradator.net> <20141219152625.GA30666@gradator.net> Message-ID: <20150106142528.GA10330@gradator.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Wenyou, On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 03:32:42AM +0000, Yang, Wenyou wrote: > > I remembered you said this patch is not formal. Now, would you like > send a formal one? Here it is, the first one is based on linux-at91/linux-3.10-at91 branch, the second one is rebased on linux-3.18 (Is this the right way when playing with multiple branch?). By the way, Wenyou fixed some bugs in the linux-3.10-at91 branch about slow clock mode which should IMHO be merged and pushed to other branches. Regards, Sylvain