All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] update-server-info: create info/* with mode 0666
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 14:39:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150106193950.GB28440@peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqh9w3px0a.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:47:01AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > +test_expect_success POSIXPERM 'info/refs is readable in unshared repo' '
> > +	rm -f .git/info/refs &&
> > +	test_unconfig core.sharedrepository &&
> > +	umask 002 &&
> > +	git update-server-info &&
> > +	echo "-rw-rw-r--" >expect &&
> > +	modebits .git/info/refs >actual &&
> > +	test_cmp expect actual
> > +'
> 
> Hmm, the label and the test look somewhat out-of-sync.  "readable as
> long as umask allows it" would be more in line with what the fix is
> about (i.e. I would expect a test with that title to pass even if I
> changed 'umask 002' to 'umask 007', but that is not what we want in
> this series).

That is definitely not what the series means to accomplish. I think
naming the test "info/refs respects umask in unshared repo" is probably
a better title for the test.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-06 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-05 19:07 git 2.2.x: Unexpected, overstrict file permissions after "git update-server-info" Paul Sokolovsky
2015-01-05 22:23 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2015-01-06  3:47 ` Jeff King
2015-01-06  3:49   ` [PATCH 1/2] t1301: set umask in reflog sharedrepository=group test Jeff King
2015-01-06  3:50   ` [PATCH 2/2] update-server-info: create info/* with mode 0666 Jeff King
2015-01-06 18:47     ` Junio C Hamano
2015-01-06 19:39       ` Jeff King [this message]
2015-01-06 21:43         ` Junio C Hamano
2015-01-06 21:47           ` Jeff King
2015-01-06 10:08   ` git 2.2.x: Unexpected, overstrict file permissions after "git update-server-info" Junio C Hamano
2015-01-06 12:43     ` Paul Sokolovsky
2015-01-06 18:44     ` Junio C Hamano
2015-01-06 19:37     ` Jeff King
2015-01-06 12:12   ` Paul Sokolovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150106193950.GB28440@peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.