From: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
<calvinowens@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ksoftirqd: Enable IRQs and call cond_resched() before poking RCU
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 17:49:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150107014906.GA27996@mail.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1420594659-16996-1-git-send-email-calvinowens@fb.com>
While debugging an issue with excessive softirq usage, I encountered the
following note in commit 3e339b5dae24a706 ("softirq: Use hotplug thread
infrastructure"):
[ paulmck: Call rcu_note_context_switch() with interrupts enabled. ]
...but despite this note, the patch still calls RCU with IRQs disabled.
This seemingly innocuous change caused a significant regression in softirq
CPU usage on the sending side of a large TCP transfer (~1 GB/s): when
introducing 0.01% packet loss, the softirq usage would jump to around 25%,
spiking as high as 50%. Before the change, the usage would never exceed 5%.
Moving the call to rcu_note_context_switch() after the cond_sched() call,
as it was originally before the hotplug patch, completely eliminated this
problem.
Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
---
Changes since v1:
I mixed up the kernel versions I was patching against, sorry!
kernel/softirq.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 501baa9..9e787d8 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -656,9 +656,13 @@ static void run_ksoftirqd(unsigned int cpu)
* in the task stack here.
*/
__do_softirq();
- rcu_note_context_switch();
local_irq_enable();
cond_resched();
+
+ preempt_disable();
+ rcu_note_context_switch();
+ preempt_enable();
+
return;
}
local_irq_enable();
--
2.1.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-07 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-07 1:37 [PATCH] ksoftirqd: Enable IRQs and call cond_resched() before poking RCU Calvin Owens
2015-01-07 1:49 ` Calvin Owens [this message]
2015-01-07 2:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-07 16:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-08 4:33 ` Calvin Owens
2015-01-08 4:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-08 21:46 ` Calvin Owens
2015-01-13 11:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-13 18:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-13 21:16 ` [PATCH] " Calvin Owens
2015-01-14 22:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-20 13:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-20 20:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-21 3:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-01-21 5:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-21 6:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-01-21 9:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-21 10:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-22 10:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150107014906.GA27996@mail.thefacebook.com \
--to=calvinowens@fb.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.