From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: arm64 fails to build in -next
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:20:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150107112019.GI7485@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150107111642.GU2634@sirena.org.uk>
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:16:42AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 05:02:36AM +0000, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > Failed defconfigs:
> > arm64-allnoconfig
> > arm64-allmodconfig
> > arm64-defconfig
>
> For the past few days the arm64 tree hasn't built at all in -next as far
> as I can see:
>
> > arm64-allmodconfig
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/mm/dump.c:55:20: error: 'PCI_IOBASE' undeclared here (not in a function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h:112:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'BUG' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > ../arch/arm64/kernel/module.c:408:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'apply_alternatives' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > ../arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c:80:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'ioremap_cache' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > ../arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c:92:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq_relaxed' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > ../arch/arm64/kernel/smp_spin_table.c:101:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'iounmap' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:47:32: error: 'PHYS_MASK' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> The other builds have a subset of these errors. I spoke to Will on IRC
> yesterday and he mentioned a missing includes fix from Paul Walmsley,
> I've not seen that fix but it sounds like it may well be relevant.
Paul posted a new series of his fixes this morning, so I'll send them in the
pull for -rc4.
Will
parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-07 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20150107111642.GU2634@sirena.org.uk>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150107112019.GI7485@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.