From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
To: Miao Xie <miaoxie@huawei.com>
Cc: <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, <Kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: delete chunk allocation attemp when setting block group ro
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:40:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150109184015.GA1363690@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54AF41E9.2000609@huawei.com>
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 10:50:17AM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 18:06:50 -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 09:01:57AM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> >> On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 13:23:13 -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> >>> Below test will fail currently:
> >>> mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/sda
> >>> btrfs-convert /dev/sda
> >>> mount /dev/sda /mnt
> >>> btrfs device add -f /dev/sdb /mnt
> >>> btrfs balance start -v -dconvert=raid1 -mconvert=raid1 /mnt
> >>>
> >>> The reason is there are some block groups with usage 0, but the whole
> >>> disk hasn't free space to allocate new chunk, so we even can't set such
> >>> block group readonly. This patch deletes the chunk allocation when
> >>> setting block group ro. For META, we already have reserve. But for
> >>> SYSTEM, we don't have, so the check_system_chunk is still required.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 31 +++++++------------------------
> >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> >>> index a80b971..430101b6 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> >>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> >>> @@ -8493,22 +8493,8 @@ static int set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, int force)
> >>> {
> >>> struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo = cache->space_info;
> >>> u64 num_bytes;
> >>> - u64 min_allocable_bytes;
> >>> int ret = -ENOSPC;
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> - /*
> >>> - * We need some metadata space and system metadata space for
> >>> - * allocating chunks in some corner cases until we force to set
> >>> - * it to be readonly.
> >>> - */
> >>> - if ((sinfo->flags &
> >>> - (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA)) &&
> >>> - !force)
> >>> - min_allocable_bytes = 1 * 1024 * 1024;
> >>> - else
> >>> - min_allocable_bytes = 0;
> >>> -
> >>> spin_lock(&sinfo->lock);
> >>> spin_lock(&cache->lock);
> >>>
> [SNIP]
> >>> ret = set_block_group_ro(cache, 0);
> >>> if (!ret)
> >>> goto out;
> >>> @@ -8566,6 +8544,11 @@ int btrfs_set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_root *root,
> >>> goto out;
> >>> ret = set_block_group_ro(cache, 0);
> >>> out:
> >>> + if (cache->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) {
> >>> + alloc_flags = update_block_group_flags(root, cache->flags);
> >>> + check_system_chunk(trans, root, alloc_flags);
> >>
> >> Please consider the case that the following patch fixed
> >> 199c36eaa95077a47ae1bc55532fc0fbeb80cc95
> >>
> >> If there is no free device space, check_system_chunk can not allocate
> >> new system metadata chunk, so when we run final step of the chunk
> >> allocation to update the device item and insert the new chunk item, we
> >> would fail.
> >
> > So the relocation will always fail in this case. The check just makes
> > the failure earlier, right? We don't have the BUG_ON in
> > do_chunk_alloc() currently.
>
> The final step of the chunk allocation is a delayed operation, we must make sure
> it can be done successfully, or we would abort the transaction, make the
> filesystem readonly and lose the data that is written into the filesystem before
> we do balance, it would make the users unconfortable.
>
> With this patch, we will set the block group successfully at the first time we
> invoke set_block_group_ro(). But if the block group that will be set to RO is
> the only system metadata block group in the filesystem, and there is no device
> space to allocate a new one, that is we have no space to deal with the pending
> final step of chunk allocation, so the problem I said above will happen.
Ok, makes sense. Updated patch:
commit d8c84ce6d40b471f5d0fb3d4e8b76d5ba424dca4
Author: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Date: Wed Jan 7 14:29:49 2015 -0800
btrfs: delete chunk allocation attemp when setting block group ro
Below test will fail currently:
mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/sda
btrfs-convert /dev/sda
mount /dev/sda /mnt
btrfs device add -f /dev/sdb /mnt
btrfs balance start -v -dconvert=raid1 -mconvert=raid1 /mnt
The reason is there are some block groups with usage 0, but the whole
disk hasn't free space to allocate new chunk, so we even can't set such
block group readonly. This patch deletes the chunk allocation when
setting block group ro. For META, we already have reserve. But for
SYSTEM, we don't have, so the check_system_chunk is still required.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index a80b971..be1aac6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -8548,14 +8548,6 @@ int btrfs_set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_root *root,
if (IS_ERR(trans))
return PTR_ERR(trans);
- alloc_flags = update_block_group_flags(root, cache->flags);
- if (alloc_flags != cache->flags) {
- ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, alloc_flags,
- CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
- if (ret < 0)
- goto out;
- }
-
ret = set_block_group_ro(cache, 0);
if (!ret)
goto out;
@@ -8566,6 +8558,11 @@ int btrfs_set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_root *root,
goto out;
ret = set_block_group_ro(cache, 0);
out:
+ if (cache->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) {
+ alloc_flags = update_block_group_flags(root, cache->flags);
+ check_system_chunk(trans, root, alloc_flags);
+ }
+
btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
return ret;
}
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-09 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-08 21:23 [PATCH] btrfs: delete chunk allocation attemp when setting block group ro Shaohua Li
2015-01-09 1:01 ` Miao Xie
2015-01-09 2:06 ` Shaohua Li
2015-01-09 2:50 ` Miao Xie
2015-01-09 18:40 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150109184015.GA1363690@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com \
--to=shli@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.