From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lizefan@huawei.com, acme@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix building error in x86_64 when dwarf unwind is on.
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:28:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150112032810.GA25581@sejong> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421029255-23039-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 10:20:55AM +0800, Wang Nan wrote:
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>
> When build with 'make ARCH=x86' and dwarf unwind is on, there is a
> compiling error:
>
> CC /home/wn/perf/arch/x86/util/unwind-libdw.o
> CC /home/wn/perf/arch/x86/tests/regs_load.o
> arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S:65: Error: operand type mismatch for `push'
> arch/x86/tests/regs_load.S:72: Error: operand type mismatch for `pop'
> make[1]: *** [/home/wn/perf/arch/x86/tests/regs_load.o] Error 1
> make[1]: INTERNAL: Exiting with 25 jobserver tokens available; should be 24!
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> ...
>
> Which is caused by incorrectly undefine macro HAVE_ARCH_X86_64_SUPPORT.
> 'config/Makefile.arch' tests __x86_64__ only when 'ARCH=x86_64'.
> However, when building x86_64 kernel, ARCH=x86 is valid and commonly
> used. Building systems, such as yocto, uses x86_64 compiler with
> 'ARCH=x86' to build x86_64 perf, which causes mismatching.
>
> As __LP64__ is defined for x86_64 as well, we can consolidate the
> __x86_64__ check to the __LP64__ check and get rid of the IS_X86_64
> IMHO.
>
> (This patch is made by Namhyung Kim when replying my v1 patch:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/7/17
>
> I modified the code to remove dependency on RAW_ARCH:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/7/865
>
> Namhyung Kim didn't provide his SOB in his original email. I add
> mine only for my modification.)
Please feel free to add my SOB to this patch.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 4 +++-
> tools/perf/config/Makefile | 2 +-
> tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> index 67a03a82..1f71a32 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> @@ -462,10 +462,12 @@ BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)builtin-bench.o
> # Benchmark modules
> BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)bench/sched-messaging.o
> BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)bench/sched-pipe.o
> -ifeq ($(RAW_ARCH),x86_64)
> +ifeq ($(ARCH), x86)
> +ifeq ($(IS_64_BIT), 1)
> BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.o
> BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)bench/mem-memset-x86-64-asm.o
> endif
> +endif
> BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)bench/mem-memcpy.o
> BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)bench/futex-hash.o
> BUILTIN_OBJS += $(OUTPUT)bench/futex-wake.o
> diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> index 5d4b039..648e31f 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ NO_PERF_REGS := 1
>
> # Additional ARCH settings for x86
> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86)
> - ifeq (${IS_X86_64}, 1)
> + ifeq (${IS_64_BIT}, 1)
> CFLAGS += -DHAVE_ARCH_X86_64_SUPPORT
> ARCH_INCLUDE = ../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S ../../arch/x86/lib/memset_64.S
> LIBUNWIND_LIBS = -lunwind -lunwind-x86_64
> diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch b/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch
> index 851cd01..ff95a68 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch
> +++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile.arch
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>
> uname_M := $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not)
>
> -ARCH ?= $(shell echo $(uname_M) | sed -e s/i.86/i386/ -e s/sun4u/sparc64/ \
> +RAW_ARCH := $(shell echo $(uname_M) | sed -e s/i.86/i386/ -e s/sun4u/sparc64/ \
> -e s/arm.*/arm/ -e s/sa110/arm/ \
> -e s/s390x/s390/ -e s/parisc64/parisc/ \
> -e s/ppc.*/powerpc/ -e s/mips.*/mips/ \
> @@ -9,23 +9,23 @@ ARCH ?= $(shell echo $(uname_M) | sed -e s/i.86/i386/ -e s/sun4u/sparc64/ \
> -e s/tile.*/tile/ )
>
> # Additional ARCH settings for x86
> -ifeq ($(ARCH),i386)
> - override ARCH := x86
> +ifeq ($(RAW_ARCH),i386)
> + ARCH ?= x86
> endif
>
> -ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
> - override ARCH := x86
> - IS_X86_64 := 0
> - ifeq (, $(findstring m32,$(CFLAGS)))
> - IS_X86_64 := $(shell echo __x86_64__ | ${CC} -E -x c - | tail -n 1)
> - RAW_ARCH := x86_64
> +ifeq ($(RAW_ARCH),x86_64)
> + ARCH ?= x86
> +
> + ifneq (, $(findstring m32,$(CFLAGS)))
> + RAW_ARCH := x86_32
> endif
> endif
>
> -ifeq (${IS_X86_64}, 1)
> +ARCH ?= $(RAW_ARCH)
> +
> +LP64 := $(shell echo __LP64__ | ${CC} ${CFLAGS} -E -x c - | tail -n 1)
> +ifeq ($(LP64), 1)
> IS_64_BIT := 1
> -else ifeq ($(ARCH),x86)
> - IS_64_BIT := 0
> else
> - IS_64_BIT := $(shell echo __LP64__ | ${CC} ${CFLAGS} -E -x c - | tail -n 1)
> + IS_64_BIT := 0
> endif
> --
> 1.8.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-12 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-27 1:26 [PATCH] perf: fix building error in x86_64 when dwarf unwind is on Wang Nan
2014-12-29 7:56 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-12-29 8:14 ` Wang Nan
2015-01-07 2:53 ` Wang Nan
2015-01-07 5:40 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-07 8:39 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-07 12:28 ` Wang Nan
2015-01-07 13:50 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-08 1:30 ` Wang Nan
2015-01-08 5:09 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-01-09 14:43 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-12 2:20 ` Wang Nan
2015-01-12 3:28 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2015-01-12 10:36 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-01-17 10:10 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf tools: Fix " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-03 19:58 [PATCH] perf: fix " Christopher Covington
2015-02-03 19:58 ` Christopher Covington
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150112032810.GA25581@sejong \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.