From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] net-timestamp: tx timestamping default mode flag
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 09:26:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150112082612.GA5348@netboy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTSfDVbSCGfJDjY3kv=SuGT221OuYAFVxDvRqouNcrJbvYw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 08:49:00PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Just so I understand: ptp has no use for the sw tstamps
> that would be generated with this flag, but is otherwise
> okay with enabling counters to order tx timestamps
> (OPT_ID) and disabling payload (OPT_TSONLY)?
Yes.
> In the documentation, I would like to strongly suggest all
> processes to enable these, even in absence of this default.
> because that is more robust wrt the sysctl (if merged).
Sounds good.
Thanks,
Richard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-12 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-09 17:31 [PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] net-timestamp: address blinding and batching Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 17:31 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 1/5] net-timestamp: no-payload option Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 19:43 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-09 19:47 ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 20:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-09 20:33 ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 20:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-09 21:18 ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 22:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-01-11 20:26 ` Richard Cochran
2015-01-15 18:22 ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 17:31 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 2/5] net-timestamp: no-payload only sysctl Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 17:31 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 3/5] net-timestamp: no-payload option in txtimestamp test Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 17:31 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 4/5] net-timestamp: tx timestamp cookies Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-09 17:31 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 5/5] net-timestamp: tx timestamping default mode flag Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-11 20:32 ` Richard Cochran
2015-01-12 1:49 ` Willem de Bruijn
2015-01-12 8:26 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150112082612.GA5348@netboy \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.