diff for duplicates of <20150113164829.GO7660@katana> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 558e2da..dd5e0fe 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 08:44:37AM -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > > > Instead of doing that we assign the first address to the device and then > > > let the driver handle rest of the addresses as it wishes. > > > -> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> -> > > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> +> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> +> > > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> > > > > Yes, seems better than what we do know. But maybe taking the lowest > > address is a bit better heuristic than taking the first address? diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index ffdae66..2d9ee88 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,14 +1,13 @@ "ref\01419860928-195404-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com\0" "ref\020150113155059.GN7660@katana\0" "ref\01421167477.4459.229.camel@spandruv-desktop.jf.intel.com\0" - "ref\01421167477.4459.229.camel-hINH/TbAiWppyMZ9rn1DP+ejPoqOX1/hEvhb3Hwu1Ks@public.gmane.org\0" - "From\0Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>\0" + "From\0Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] i2c / ACPI: Pick the first address if device has multiple\0" "Date\0Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:48:29 +0100\0" - "To\0Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>" - linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - " linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0" + "To\0Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>\0" + "Cc\0Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>" + linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org + " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0" "\01:1\0" "b\0" "On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 08:44:37AM -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:\n" @@ -21,8 +20,8 @@ "> > > Instead of doing that we assign the first address to the device and then\n" "> > > let the driver handle rest of the addresses as it wishes.\n" "> > > \n" - "> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>\n" - "> > > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>\n" + "> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>\n" + "> > > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>\n" "> > \n" "> > Yes, seems better than what we do know. But maybe taking the lowest\n" "> > address is a bit better heuristic than taking the first address?\n" @@ -59,4 +58,4 @@ "=WO18\n" "-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n" -5c050788f8706b3191519ae56135a20e53d45698878d8c95768260ed526592dd +8358728caef485b889d662e39b303f0aeb99faae81cebf0afe186c09baa1e4e3
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.