From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] How SRP initiator performance has been improved via scsi-mq Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 01:15:21 -0800 Message-ID: <20150115091521.GA3360@infradead.org> References: <54B638E3.3030406@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:37741 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752241AbbAOJPX (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 04:15:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54B638E3.3030406@sandisk.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: "lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Christoph Hellwig , Mike Snitzer , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:37:39AM +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Recently it has been proposed to discuss how to add scsi-mq support in > the iSER initiator during the 2015 edition of the LSF/MM summit. In the > discussion that followed that proposal several questions were asked > about how scsi-mq support has been added in the SRP initiator driver, > which design choices have been made and which lessons have been learned. > Hence the proposal to add a topic to the LSF/MM schedule for reporting > how scsi-mq support has been added in the SRP initiator. > > For the actual discussion see also Sagi Grimberg, [LSF/MM TOPIC] iSCSI > MQ adoption via MCS discussion, linux-scsi mailing list, January 7, 2015 > (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi/98199). > > Christoph and Mike, if you would like to complement this topic with a > presentation about the scsi-mq core itself and/or integration of > multiqueue support in the device mapper multipath driver, I would > welcome this. A big long blk-mq / scsi-mq sessions sounds like a good plan. That can include a brief overview of the existing work and all the still pending bits for iSCSI/iSER, multipath and so on.