From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: dm + blk-mq soft lockup complaint Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:43:43 -0500 Message-ID: <20150115154343.GA11859@redhat.com> References: <20150112191138.GC21518@redhat.com> <20150112202113.GA23234@redhat.com> <54B50F9D.2040000@sandisk.com> <20150113141746.GA30411@redhat.com> <54B52B73.7040807@sandisk.com> <20150113162052.GA30837@redhat.com> <54B633DC.4090806@sandisk.com> <20150114185926.GB6012@redhat.com> <54B7764C.9000402@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54B7764C.9000402@sandisk.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Keith Busch , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , device-mapper development , Jun'ichi Nomura , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Thu, Jan 15 2015 at 3:11am -0500, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 01/14/15 20:00, Mike Snitzer wrote: > > IB aside, I haven't been following along close enough on scsi-mq > > developments, but does a regular iscsi initiator have support for > > scsi-mq? I'd like to validate scsi-mq devices with the dm-mpath > > changes. > > Hello Mike, > > scsi-mq support for the iSCSI initiator is being considered but has not > yet been implemented. For more information, see also Sagi Grimberg, > [LSF/MM TOPIC] iSCSI MQ adoption via MCS discussion, linux-scsi mailing > list, January 7, 2015 (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi/98199). OK, thanks. FYI, I just used your fio test against an mpath device that is using 4 virtio-scsi devices with blk-mq enabled and all worked fine. How easily could you reproduce your SRP hang? Did it happen every run or did it take multiple runs to see it?