From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] Add kdbus implementation Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:18:24 -0800 Message-ID: <20150116221824.GA512@kroah.com> References: <1421435777-25306-1-git-send-email-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Josh Boyer Cc: Arnd Bergmann , "Eric W. Biederman" , One Thousand Gnomes , Tom Gundersen , Jiri Kosina , Andy Lutomirski , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" , daniel@zonque.org, David Herrmann , tixxdz@opendz.org List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 05:07:25PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > This can also be found in a git tree, the kdbus branch of char-misc.git at: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc.git/ > > Is this now the canonical tree? I ask because the github tree hasn't > been updated in quite some time. That's my fault, it's just a mirror of the code.google.com tree for people who like to use github. It's now updated. > The code.google.com tree has commits > from 2 days ago, but it still calls d_materialise_unique in fs.c > whereas the patchset you've posted uses the correct d_splice_alias. > So the code.google.com tree doesn't actually compile against 3.19-rcX. > > I'm confused where we're supposed to track things now. I think the google tree is the "correct" one, but when generating patches, apis are tweaked to work properly with the latest -rc kernel for submission. Daniel knows more though, he's the one generating the patchsets, I don't know how he's doing it exactly. thanks, greg k-h