From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
To: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-numa@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libnuma: add check for return value of numa_node_to_cpus
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 10:44:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150119164416.GA28086@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421225627-9272-1-git-send-email-pholasek@redhat.com>
Hi Petr,
Thanks for the patch.
Sorry for the delay. I'm getting used to a new work flow for
numactl/libnuma source. (it is also now at https://github.com/numactl/numactl)
I started a new release candidate series for 2.0.11:
ftp://oss.sgi.com/www/projects/libnuma/download/
your patch is in numactl-2.0.11-rc1.tar.gz
Your patch is important for machines with non-contiguos node numbers, and
I don't seem to have a system to test that. So I'm depending on all interested
parties to test it.
-Cliff
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 09:53:47AM +0100, Petr Holasek wrote:
> When numa_node_to_cpu() has been called on machine with non-contiguous
> nodes, it returned the first node which wasn't present on machine.
> Now, return code is checked and code skips over non-existing nodes to
> the right one.
>
> Also, caching of numa_node_to_cpus_v2() result while non-zero error had
> been returned was disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>
> ---
> libnuma.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libnuma.c b/libnuma.c
> index 91425ae..8d7bf13 100644
> --- a/libnuma.c
> +++ b/libnuma.c
> @@ -1382,8 +1382,12 @@ numa_node_to_cpus_v2(int node, struct bitmask *buffer)
> if (mask != buffer)
> numa_bitmask_free(mask);
> } else {
> - node_cpu_mask_v2[node] = mask;
> - }
> + /* we don't want to cache faulty result */
> + if (!err)
> + node_cpu_mask_v2[node] = mask;
> + else
> + numa_bitmask_free(mask);
> + }
> return err;
> }
> __asm__(".symver numa_node_to_cpus_v2,numa_node_to_cpus@@libnuma_1.2");
> @@ -1405,7 +1409,10 @@ int numa_node_of_cpu(int cpu)
> bmp = numa_bitmask_alloc(ncpus);
> nnodes = numa_max_node();
> for (node = 0; node <= nnodes; node++){
> - numa_node_to_cpus_v2_int(node, bmp);
> + if (numa_node_to_cpus_v2_int(node, bmp) < 0) {
> + /* It's possible for the node to not exist */
> + continue;
> + }
> if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(bmp, cpu)){
> ret = node;
> goto end;
> --
> 2.1.0
--
Cliff Wickman
SGI
cpw@sgi.com
(651)683-7524 vnet 207524
(651)482-9347 home
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-19 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 8:53 [PATCH] libnuma: add check for return value of numa_node_to_cpus Petr Holasek
2015-01-19 16:44 ` Cliff Wickman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150119164416.GA28086@sgi.com \
--to=cpw@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-numa@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pholasek@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.