From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753953AbbAUAPm (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:15:42 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:33919 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751665AbbAUAPj (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 19:15:39 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 16:15:37 -0800 From: Stephen Boyd To: Tomeu Vizoso Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Turquette , Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] Per-user clock constraints Message-ID: <20150121001537.GF27202@codeaurora.org> References: <1421760306-6301-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1421760306-6301-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/20, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > > A rough test module was used to test this: > > http://cgit.collabora.com/git/user/tomeu/linux.git/tree/drivers/misc/clk-test.c?h=per-user-clk-constraints-v10 > Would it be possible to also send a patch for this? It would be nice to have some unit test module for the entire framework and this could be the start of such a module. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project