From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
uobergfe@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: Confusing behaviour with /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:30:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150121143028.GD116159@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150121105251.GA3040@hawk.usersys.redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:52:51AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:39:42PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 09:34:20AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > > > commit 9919e39a1738 ("kvm: ensure hard lockup detection is disabled
> > > > by default") provided a way for the kernel to disable the hard
> > > > lockup detector at runtime.
> > > >
> > > > I'm using it on ppc64 but notice some weird behaviour with the
> > > > nmi_watchdog procfs variable. At boot, that the hard lockup
> > > > detector appears to be enabled even when we disable it via
> > > > watchdog_enable_hardlockup_detector(false):
> > > >
> > > > # cat /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
> > > > 1
> > > >
> > > > I have to echo 0 to it then echo 1 again to enable it.
> > > >
> > > > Anton
> > >
> > > Hi Anton,
> > >
> > > Yes, the nmi watchdog proc variables are currently a bit
> > > confusing. Uli has posted a series to clear all that up
> > > though. Please see
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/17/340
> >
> > Any progress on this? I'm rebasing our hardware NMI patch for ppc64 and
> > notice the strange behaviour is still in mainline.
> >
>
> Hi Anton,
>
> I'm not aware of anything blocking this series, but maybe I missed
> something. Andrew Morton and Don Zickus are the ones to ask. Andrew?
> Don?
Hi Drew,
I poked Andrew again. I believe he is the person who usually takes my
patches in.
Cheers,
Don
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-21 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-04 22:34 Confusing behaviour with /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog Anton Blanchard
2014-11-05 10:26 ` Andrew Jones
2015-01-21 3:39 ` Anton Blanchard
2015-01-21 10:52 ` Andrew Jones
2015-01-21 14:30 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2014-11-05 14:53 ` Don Zickus
2014-11-05 18:53 ` Anton Blanchard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150121143028.GD116159@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=uobergfe@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.