Re: virtio for 3.20

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:29:44AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:56:28PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> >> > Hi Rusty, all
> >> >
> >> > I parked outstanding virtio patches here:
> >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git vhost-next
> >> > this way they are merged in linux-next as well.
> >> >
> >> > Rusty if you'll be doing 3.20 window, would you mind
> >> > checking that tree to verify nothing's lost?
> >> 
> >> Hi Michael,
> >> 
> >>         Thanks, now I've returned from linux.conf.au, I'm starting to
> >> organize the 3.20 queue.  I've merged this branch into my virtio-next
> >> branch.
> >> 
> >> Cheers,
> >> Rusty.
> >
> > Thanks, good to know.
> > I tweaked some patches since due to test failure reports by Gerd.
> > Updated patches are tagged "post-squash", if you want to see what
> > changed, see fixup patches in the series tagged "pre-squash".
> >
> > Or you can look at my tree:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git virtio-next
> > is pre-squash.
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git vhost-next
> > is post-squash.
> 
> OK, I merged your vhost-next with my virtio-next, and the merge was
> empty.
> 
> So we're up-to-date.  Please send patches against my virtio-next from
> now on.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rusty.

Will do, thanks!


-- 
MST