From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile: do not compile git with debugging symbols by default
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:09:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150122150914.GA20135@glandium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150122130036.GC19681@peff.net>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 08:00:36AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:50:37PM +0600, Alexander Kuleshov wrote:
>
> > Standard user has no need in debugging information. This patch adds
> > DEBUG=1 option to compile git with debugging symbols and compile without
> > it by default.
>
> This explanation is missing why it is beneficial _not_ to have the
> debugging information.
>
> I expect the answer is "it makes the executable smaller". And that is
> true, but it gets smaller still if you run "strip" on the result:
>
> $ make CFLAGS= >/dev/null 2>&1 && wc -c <git
> 2424248
>
> $ make CFLAGS=-g >/dev/null 2>&1 && wc -c <git
> 4500816
>
> $ strip git && wc -c <git
> 2109200
>
> So I am not sure who this is helping. If you are size-conscious, you
> should use strip, in which case the "-g" flag does not matter (and we
> even have "make strip" to help you).
>
> Is there some other reason to avoid the debugging information?
Maybe this comes from the misconception that debugging information
changes the generated code, which, in fact, it doesn't.
$ make CFLAGS=-g LDFLAGS=-Wl,--build-id=none >/dev/null 2>&1 && wc -c <git
4432768
$ strip --strip-debug git && wc -c < git
2391120
$ cp git git_
$ make -j4 CFLAGS= LDFLAGS=-Wl,--build-id=none >/dev/null 2>&1 && wc -c <git
2400192
$ strip --strip-debug git && wc -c < git
2391120
$ diff -s git git_
Files git and git_ are identical
LDFLAGS=-Wl,--build-id=none just avoids creating a .note.gnu.build-id
section containing a uuid that varies between builds. The 9k difference
between unstripped vs stripped for the no-debug-info case comes from the
removal of the few symbols for source file names (all the symbols from
readelf -s git | grep ABS).
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-22 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-22 12:50 [PATCH] Makefile: do not compile git with debugging symbols by default Alexander Kuleshov
2015-01-22 13:00 ` Jeff King
2015-01-22 15:09 ` Mike Hommey [this message]
2015-01-22 16:51 ` Alexander Kuleshov
2015-01-22 16:53 ` Alexander Kuleshov
2015-01-22 17:36 ` Matthieu Moy
2015-01-22 18:35 ` Jeff King
2015-01-22 22:55 ` Mike Hommey
2015-01-27 8:43 ` David Aguilar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150122150914.GA20135@glandium.org \
--to=mh@glandium.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=kuleshovmail@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.