From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched, timer: Use atomics for thread_group_cputimer stats
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 09:57:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150123085705.GG2896@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421983913.4432.22.camel@j-VirtualBox>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 07:31:53PM -0800, Jason Low wrote:
> When running a database workload, we found a scalability issue
> with itimers.
>
> Much of the problem was caused by the thread_group_cputimer spinlock.
> Each time we account for group system/user time, we need to obtain a
> thread_group_cputimer's spinlock to update the timers. On larger
> systems (such as a 16 socket machine), this caused more than 30% of
> total time spent trying to obtain the kernel lock to update these
> group timer stats.
>
> This patch converts the timers to 64 bit atomic variables and use
> atomic add to update them without a lock. With this patch, the percent
> of total time spent updating thread group cputimer timers was reduced
> from 30% down to less than 1%.
I'll have to look; I worry about consistency between the values. But why
would any self respecting piece of software use this crap stuff? Its a
guaranteed scalability fail.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-23 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-23 3:31 [RFC PATCH] sched, timer: Use atomics for thread_group_cputimer stats Jason Low
2015-01-23 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-01-23 9:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 19:23 ` Jason Low
2015-01-23 20:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 23:39 ` Jason Low
2015-01-23 23:45 ` Jason Low
2015-01-26 17:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 9:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-01-23 18:07 ` Jason Low
2015-01-23 20:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150123085705.GG2896@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.