From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Subject: Re: dom0 pvops and rearranging memory layout Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:09:41 -0500 Message-ID: <20150123150941.GK7365@l.oracle.com> References: <54C22334.2070604@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54C22334.2070604@suse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Juergen Gross Cc: Boris Ostrovsky , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , David Vrabel , Jan Beulich List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:32:20AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > Hi, > > while testing new patches to support dom0 with more than 512 GB I > stumbled over an issue which - I think - is present in pvops for > some time now. > > On boot the kernel rearranges the memory layout to match the host > E820 map. This is done to be able to access all I/O areas with > identity mapped pfns (pfn == mfn). So basically some memory pages > change their pfns while the mfns stay the same. > > There is no check done whether the moved memory areas are actually > in use (e.g. via memblock_is_reserved()). This can lead to cases > where memory in use is put to an area which is made available for > new memory allocations soon afterwards. Memory in question could > be the initrd, the p2m map presented to dom0 by the hypervisor, or > (hopefully in theory only) even the kernel itself or it's initial > page tables built by the hypervisor. > > In my test I had a p2m map of nearly 2GB size and the area between Oh my. That is huge. Could you compress it? This would require of course a new type of P2M - where would mark which MFNs are contingous. And then during booting you could read over and find these special ones and when creating the new P2M do the right uncompression? > 2GB and 4GB had no RAM. So parts of the p2m map and the complete > initrd where subject to be remapped which led to an early PANIC. > > I'll try to add some special handling for the initrd and the p2m > map. In case someone has a better idea: please tell me. > > > Juergen