From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: -EINTR return in domain_relinquish_resources
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:46:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150123154613.GA15927@l.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54C2782B0200007800058F01@mail.emea.novell.com>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 03:34:51PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 23.01.15 at 15:46, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On 23/01/15 14:32, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:11:25AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>>>> On 22.01.15 at 17:38, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:00:35AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 21.01.15 at 22:27, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> As I was looking at some of the XSA I realized that the
> >>>>>> call-chain of:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> domain_relinquish_resources
> >>>>>> ->vcpu_destroy_pagetables
> >>>>>> -> put_page_and_type_preemptible
> >>>>>> -> __put_page_type
> >>>>>> returns -EINTR
> >>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>> b). Or should the hypervisor convert the -EINTR to -ERESTART
> >>>>>> (or -EAGAIN) - which most of the code (see users of
> >>>>>> get_page_type_preemptible) do right now?
> >>>>> This one, in vcpu_destroy_pagetables(). I'm afraid I overlooked
> >>>>> this when adding the preemption capability here.
> >>>> OK. Would this RFC patch be OK? (I can send it off as normal - just
> >>>> want to make sure you are OK with this being put there)
> >>> Conceptually yes, but there are issues:
> >>>
> >>>> From 1558a9870f438df949a8ad09a27825bd35a9f4ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>>> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> >>>> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:34:21 -0500
> >>>> Subject: [PATCH] domain: In vcpu_destroy_pagetables we can return -EINTR
> >>>> instead of -EAGAIN
> >>> You should stop sending such conversions to EAGAIN. We switched
> >>> to ERESTART, and you (just guessing) taking the patch from an
> >>> older Xen version shouldn't result in this recurring mistake.
> >> Nah, Andrew said in his email EAGAIN so that is what I picked.
> >
> > EAGAIN was correct for the domain_destroy hypercall, at this hypercall
> > explicitly has continuation built into its API via EAGAIN.
>
> Ouch - I based the comment on code resulting from a patch I
> didn't send out yet (largely because Konrad indicated issues with
> XEN_DOMCTL_destroydomain that I'd need to look into in more
> detail before doing so), doing away with the tool stack based
> continuations. Yet based on what domain_kill() does with
> domain_relinquish_resources()'s return value, it should
> nevertheless be -ERESTART here to ease future changes.
OK :-)
>From ac642805a96261f518fbba7d47f3ca38c950b3c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:34:21 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] domain: In vcpu_destroy_pagetables we can return -ERESTART
instead of -EINTR
which has the side effect that domain_relinquish_resources will stop
and return to user-space -EINTR - which it is not equipped to deal with.
The preemption mechanism we have to domain destruction is to return
-EAGAIN and as such we need to catch the case of:
domain_relinquish_resources
->vcpu_destroy_pagetables
-> put_page_and_type_preemptible
-> __put_page_type
returns -EINTR
and convert it to the proper type.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
---
v2: Add comment and s/ERESTART/EAGAIN/
---
xen/arch/x86/mm.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
index 6e9c2c0..5452c01 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm.c
@@ -2677,6 +2677,16 @@ int vcpu_destroy_pagetables(struct vcpu *v)
v->arch.cr3 = 0;
+ /*
+ * The put_page_and_type_preemptible is liable to return -EINTR. Other
+ * callers of it filter the -EINTR to whatever they deem applicable - in
+ * this case we MUST do it as the caller of this function will return the
+ * error code to userspace. And userspace for domain destruction expects
+ * -EAGAIN (domain_relinquish_resources converts ERESTART to -EAGAIN).
+ */
+ if ( rc == -EINTR )
+ rc = -ERESTART;
+
return rc;
}
--
2.1.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-23 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-21 21:27 -EINTR return in domain_relinquish_resources Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-01-21 21:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-01-21 22:57 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-01-22 16:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-01-22 10:00 ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-22 16:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-01-23 9:11 ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-23 14:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-01-23 14:46 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-01-23 15:34 ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-23 15:46 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2015-01-23 16:03 ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-23 17:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-01-26 9:36 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150123154613.GA15927@l.oracle.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.